Course:ANTH309/2024/Western Himalayas

From UBC Wiki

The Impact of Political Vulnerability on the Western Himalayas


Map of India and Pakistan highlighting the borders and the line of control.

Today, the Western Himalayas are located between Eastern Pakistan, Northern India, and Southwest China. Historically, this region existed as the kingdoms of Kashmir and Ladakh. The region faces significant instability contributing to intense vulnerability in marginalized regions. Disputes exist between Pakistan and India over the territory of Kashmir, and between China and India at the ‘line of actual control’ outside Ladakh.[1][2] The incessant conflict, and the political vulnerability resulting from it, has influenced all aspects of the region.

The Western Himalayas are unique in that the region is a hotspot of biodiversity, extremely risk-prone for climate crises, deeply linguistically diverse, home to a multitude of faiths and ethnic groups, and is rapidly changing as India, Pakistan, and China increase in power.[1] These diverse aspects intersect and influence each other, resulting in continuous vulnerability due to the political difficulties involved in navigating complex, and nuanced issues.

The Western Himalayas have always experienced climate hazards due to their unique geographic location, however, political vulnerability only accentuates the risk, exposure, and hazards of these climate disasters. The ability of state power to address the climate crisis is hindered by the political vulnerabilities of the region. This impacts many of the local community members since their human activities depend on the altering climate change.[3][4] On the other hand, political tensions and the resulting increase in violence in the region have led to complex citizenship ideologies and threatened the livelihood of Indigenous languages and cultures. Recent political events have had significant impacts on the sense of identity for those living in the region. The conflict between India and Pakistan has altered the sense of belonging felt by the citizens of Kashmir, leading many to ponder the future of citizenship in the region.[5] Tensions between India, China, and Pakistan remain significant hinderances to Indigenous cultures and as language realities shift, it is essential to build conflict resolution strategies.[6][7] Patterns of political impact compromise the preservation of cultural diversity in Northwest India as resources are diverted away from preservation to fund conflicts.[1] Socio-political factors such as insurgency, ethnic conflict, and political neglect threaten the pluralism of traditions, belief systems, and languages that exist in the region.[8] Understanding the detrimental influence of political vulnerability on citizenship, culture, and language is instrumental for identifying the changes needed to ensure that communities flourish in an evolving world.

Political vulnerability is also intertwined with the implications it has on economic aspects concerning how the policy changes of political agendas impact household economies in a way that increases economic vulnerability. Similarly, political vulnerability has shaped the cultural understanding of gender and the development of technology and cybersecurity in the Western Himalayas.

In the following chapters, we will discuss the multifaceted impacts political vulnerability has had on the Western Himalayan region and the ways interactions and cultural developments have had in the wake of political vulnerability. As a group, we will explore how these political aspects have shaped the Western Himalayas into what it is today and how it impacts their society.

Climate Vulnerabilities in The Western Himalayas

Example of a map

The Western Himalayan region faces growing risk from global warming and climate change at a greater rate, due to the unique geography that shapes this ecologically important region. Human agents of climate change such as infrastructure development projects as well as other forms of human interventions are accentuating vulnerabilities. Physical and socio-economic factors contribute to the vulnerability, exposure, and adaptive capacities of the region’s populations. Such hazardous factors are intrinsically linked to political instabilities that the region faces as it borders Pakistan, India, and China. These three geopolitical powers are all invested in various infrastructure development and land claims in the Western Himalayan region that deprioritize the climate emergency.

The Himalayan region is home for rich cultural interrelations, and also a rich ecology including the housing of ice deposits. These ice deposits are a major feeder of Asia’s river systems. The effects climate changes and global warming has on the status of these ice deposits interfere with its control and management of monsoons, flooding, and silt deposits throughout the Himalayan watershed, impacting a larger region of Asia via major rivers systems.[1]

The Indian Institute of Technology preformed a study of the Western Himalaya region evaluating risks of climate change by focusing on hazards, exposure, vulnerability, and adaptive capacities.[9] These factors explored physical environment hazards as well as impacts of socio-political factors that can indicate risk. The study supported the identification of disadvantaged populations in changing circumstances.[9] These indicators can be applied further to break down and understand how communities' experiences climate vulnerability as it relates to political vulnerability.

The impacts of global warming are linked to anthropogenic agents that threaten to increase hazards by accelerating climate changes in the already fragile and risk prone region. Anthropologist Dolly Kikon identified anthropogenic agents involved with resource extraction that impacted community life while working in Northeast India.[10] In her ethnography she discusses resource politics, structured by state power orchestrating the exploitation of resources that consequentially impacts to local communities. Kikon looks primarily at mining projects extracting coal and oil that in turn pollutes the air and water sources and causes environmental degradation.[10] State power that grants access to land for mining is responsible for the destruction of that land such as deforestation that leads to land erosion and landslides.[10] These observed mining projects have a cause-and-effect relationship with local communities. The results or mining projects are multifaceted in their impacts also leading to displacement of residents reshaping communities.[10] These are implications of human agents that can likewise be associated with infrastructure projects in the Western Himalayas.

The competitive politics between India, Pakistan, and China have characterized the space of the Western Himalayan region with political vulnerabilities. These three geopolitical powers all have investments in infrastructure of territorial claims that act as anthropogenic accelerants to climate issues. The state-making projects of India and China have set a competitive stage in the Western Himalayas that has caused excessive development project to be carried out without necessary climate advisement.[11] Public news outlets voice concerns over the climate risks ignored in construction and the lack of disaster preparedness or prevention by both India and Chinas road construction, hydro power projects, and railway system.[11] Pace of construction project has created hazards by rushing through safety and climate precautions that should be considered in this fragile environment that already faces natural disaster risk form seismic activity.[12] India and China’s disregard for climate concerns has been called ‘criminal negligence’ that could risk disaster[12].

The study by the Indian Institute of Technology quantified exposure as the extent of consequence from risk that structures or systems face. This concept is integrated with hazards which relate to the likelihood of risk an area face.[9] Human interventions: damns, hydropower projects, highways, and military development, associated with the infrastructure competition between political powers are all increasing the hazards effecting the communities of the Western Himalayas.[11] The increasing likelihood of risk from state-making projects also increases exposure to threats of food insecurity, flooding, property loss, and the loss of human lives.[12] The accentuated opportunity for negative impacts are climate vulnerabilities accentuated by state precarities. Vulnerabilities surrounding hazards and exposure is also tied to the quality of adaptive capacities possessed by the local communities. Adaptive capacity is dependent on access to resources like clean drinking water, electricity, and aid.[9] Unchecked infrastructure development, and impaired adaptive capacity is also accompanied by unregulated tourism and pilgrimage that burdens the Western Himalayas.[12] Further impacts of tourism and pilgrimage highlight how the carrying capacity of the region is be impacted by environmental degradation.[12] Such factors of adaptability are directly impacted by political aid provided to the Western Himalayan region. Political vulnerability and insecurity greatly diminish the resources provided and in turn made accessible too regional communities. Aid and political support relate to the ways state power has already addressed climate security, the lack of which is an expression of the political instability the region is entrenched in.

Figure 1. Mapping of recent climate disasters in the Western Himalaya according to Business Standard article.

The Western Himalayan regions importance as a reservoir of water in glacial ice packs is underestimated in a global scale. The climate vulnerability the region faces has global impact in terms of how far stretched the devastating impact will reach. In Figure 1 I have assembled a map of locations already facing climate devastation.[12] The state powers lack of action in developing a response to or preparation for the ongoing climate emergencies is ironic to the way traditional land uses has been criticized for lacking economic interest. Indigenous activists have disregarded the ways political states have characterized them as lacking development because they see the direct relation between ‘development’ and environmental destruction, that they refuse to take part in[13]. External perspectives of the Himalayas as being ‘inhospitable’ and a ‘harsh environment’ encourage state development.[13] State support of human interventions, such as dams and changing of land uses practices, has caused harm to the environment.[12] The inclusion of Indigenous ways of thinking and Indigenous conceptions of land would reorient the priority of land and environment over economic gain. Placing more value in Indigenous knowledge and ways of seeing the interconnectedness between people and land could inform more sustainable land policies and address growing vulnerabilities from hazards and exposure communities of the Western Himalayas face.  

Navigating Political Vulnerability and The Impacts of Climate Change in the Western Himalayas

Terrace Farm in Uttarakhand, India

Climate vulnerability has always been a widespread concern. In the Western Himalayas, many of the local communities are strongly impacted due to the fact it increases the risk to their livestock. In recent years, they have experienced floods, droughts, and earthquakes, making the Himalayas one of the world's most hazardous places. Many local people in the Western Himalayas have a self-reliant lifestyle such as farming, and as climate change intensifies, the local communities continue to experience challenges, that impact their everyday life. In my section, I will explore how these implications impact the local community, the political responses to these crises and how giving a voice to the local communities is necessary.

Implications of the local communities

The knowledge of climate change and the understanding of global warming is vital for the people who live in these communities. Since many people rely on farming, livestock plays a significant role in the community as it is a major source of income in their everyday lives[4]. Depending on the region, factors such as household food security, annual income and social bonding are all impacting farmers differently[4]. In Uttarakhand, India, environmental hazards such as forest fires, floods, and landslides have strongly impacted the production and harvesting of their foods, restricting their food choices[4]. Since mountain agriculture is highly dependent on the weather, climate changes significantly affect on the food supply in the Himalayan region[14]. There is a lack of power and control over the livelihood of the farmers, and the Uttarakhand State Action Plan on Climate Change (SAPCC) has identified that farmers in the Western Himalayas are highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change[4]. However, not everyone who lives in these local communities are unaware of how exactly it interferes with social and economic factors in their everyday lives. This is seen in the Ladakh community as one member stated that because they did not have people to work in the fields, people in the community have little concern over climate change[3]. It is important to understand that every region in the Western Himalayas carries different characteristics, and each region will have different concerns. Therefore, the “one-size-fits-all” solution must be avoided[4].

Political Response

The government has slowly understood the extent and consequences of climate change in the Western Himalayas. In the article "The Role of Place in Adapting to Climate Change: A Case Study from Ladak, Western Himalayas", the author found that the local community members who had no education were often farmers, and who also understood climate change through patterns and their memories[3]. They have had to cope with climate change, especially in recent years. However, the perspective from the local communities about climate change and its impacts can be entirely different from what science has understood climate change based on recorded data [3]. Therefore, it is significant that local knowledge is used and heard to work towards a solution. The consequences of ignoring the local people are seen in the Northern side of the Himalayas - Tibetan environment; the Tibetan pastoralists have made it mandatory to fence the rangeland, which thus erased the “Indigenous ways of conceptualizing the land”[13]. For Tibetans, the land is considered an ancestral territory; it is profoundly local, social and spiritual to them[13]. The government says the local people are “lagging” in understanding modernization, but the author argues the governments are only lagging in destroying the earth”[13]. Local communities are being ignored by the Tibetan Pastoralists, similar to how the government and the scientific community are not listening to the farmers and understanding their perspective of climate change. Therefore, it is important to understand the factors at a local scale that will help reduce the likelihood of government or non-government organization interventions that lead to maladaptation[4].


Therefore, to have more successful outcomes, the underlying issues that are stressing climate change must be addressed. As seen in Nepal, after the major earthquakes in 2015, many anthropologists began to discuss the underlying issues that are causing earthquakes alongside other issues related to climate change[15]. Through this process, they found that one must be understanding earthquakes, such as where the landslide zones are[16]. Applying this idea to the Western Himalayas, there must be an emphasis on getting the local communities involved in the process. The local communities are the ones impacted by climate change, and therefore, the policymakers should prioritize achieving a balance between conservation and the livelihood of the local people[17]. In the article “Climate Change and the Western Himalayan Community: Exploring the local perspective through food choices”, Das and Mishra emphasize how “perceptual knowledge of the local communities is imperative for effective communication and adaption strategies”[14]. They discuss how local communities’ perspectives are crucial for sustainable climate change policy since local communities take care of 80% of the world’s biodiversity[14]. Policymakers are testing new approaches, but without innovations and communication with those who benefit them, finding a proper solution that works is difficult[17]. It is also important to stress that climate change impacts the rural areas whose livelihoods are dependent on agricultural resources, and where climate change causes long-term impacts[18]. Hence, the local people’s traditional knowledge is a necessity to understand the potential solutions to climate change. Recognizing and understanding the local communities’ beliefs, traditions, and culture when it comes to environmental policymaking can help further understand the challenges of climate change.


The Western Himalayas experience political vulnerability, making it difficult to work towards a successful solution to climate change. Therefore, the government must emphasize working together with the local communities. There must be an emphasis on allowing the local community to contribute to environmental policymaking, especially members who practice agricultural production since they are directly impacted by climate change[18]. To move forward and to work towards a holistic approach, the local communities' voices must be heard; by doing so and by working together, the Western Himalayas can work towards a more ideal solution to climate vulnerability.

A: International Relations

China - India border map.

China, India, and Pakistan hold a long history of tension through border control and state-making projects. The dispute for territorial control has led to many wars and persistent militarisation. Although the wars were short, tensions have remained between China, India, and Pakistan – all of whom have become nuclear-armed states[1]. This has enabled a seemingly permanent state of low-level but persistent tension causing political vulnerability[1]. The Belt and Road initiative plans (BRI) by China for infrastructure development through the Himalayan region has also created a threat to traditional cultures for vulnerable communities and their fragile ecologies. Such militarisation and competitive developments are threatening local cultures and exacerbating tensions among the region’s ethnic groups – not to mention its drastic effects on global warming[1]. This section will focus on the history of the international relations between these three countries and potential solutions.

History of War

The China- India War (also referred to as the Sino-Indian War) was fought in October - November 1962 [19]. One of the reasons for the cause of war is known to be due to border dispute in the Western and Eastern portion of China (composed of Aksai, China - Ladakh, India and China - Sikkim) [19]. The war produced the Line of Actual Control (the border) along their Eastern and Western borders [2]. Pakistan and India gained their independence in 1947 from British imperialism but held a security dilemma and lack of trust between each other causing wars between them over the region Kashmir [6]. Three wars broke between each other in 1965, 1971, and lastly, 1999. Since then, efforts have been made to resolve issues but have proved to be futile as both sides are not ready to believe each other regardless of the UN Resolutions [6]. The history of wars brought by border disputes have since created a long standing tension between each other. Mainly, China - India and India - Pakistan have tensions that remain to this day. China and Pakistan relations had been cordial since the 1950s and became more aligned after the 1962 Sino-Indian War due to Pakistan’s rivalry with India [20].  India’s ultimate aim is to enable its own transformation into a great power without inciting a conflict with China; therefore, India has chosen to avoid provoking China [20]. That being said, tensions between borders and their militarisation put the people in the region at risk for losing their culture and languages and threaten the region’s ecologies. The nomads that travel the Himalayan mountains are no longer able to travel the mountains freely and have limited mobility affecting their culture and way of living [21].

BRI Project

China’s BRI project (Belt and Road Initiative) in Nepal and Pakistan have exacerbated such tensions mentioned above. India has rejected to be a part of the project as they felt it was a violation of India’s sovereignty [20]. The BRI project has seen mixed results. Since the initiation of the project, the countries involved has seen economic growth; however, it has fallen short on environmental, social, and governance measures [22]. The project has also affected the biodiversity of the regions and been a threat to local cultures. Many of the communities were given incentives to be a part of this infrastructural development. Such projects however were built through human labor and were only compensated with poor quality rice bags in Nepal. The shift in road development caused confusion for small communities to integrate into an economy based society and to leave their cultural practices. In Pakistan, there has been an uptick in civil and armed resistance against BRI projects due to its environmental, social and governance consequences [22]. Amusan from the journal “The Diplomat” believes that the BRI is set to become more politicized by local elites to elevate their political legitimacy rather than promoting inclusive socio economic development [22]. Such reality will create more distrust between the neighboring countries and bring forth tension between one another.

Conclusion and Solution

The history of war and the development projects in the Western Himalayan region continues to cause tension and divide between the nations involved and their neighboring countries. The tensions continue to act as a threat to its communities involved and its vital biodiversity. The Himalayan mountain is known for being a spiritual ground providing living for those who share unique cultures and languages. Such communities are intimately connected to their land and have been largely affected due to border militarisation and developmental projects. They have been denied mobility and are experiencing a shift in cultural traditions as economic growth has led them to pursue a cash based society rather than trading goods. These tensions that cause political vulnerability in this region must be addressed and be offered intervention. Much of the issue between these three countries (India, China, and Pakistan) are deeply rooted in their lack of trust from one another. Therefore, trust building measures must be taken by these governments through cross border interactions in order to establish constant communication channels which can even work during hostile times [6]. This could possibly be in the form of government leaders meeting with the opposing government leaders and building trust and alliance. That being said, the long standing history of hostility towards each other can make this seem as a far-fetched goal and improbable. In regards to the tensions between China and India, Pardesi argues that in order for the two nations to co-exist peacefully, China needs to accommodate India’s aspirations and identity as a great power in Asia. Simultaneously, India needs to accept China as a legitimate player in South Asia and the Indian Ocean [20].  Lastly, the IR needs to engage in a new method of research to unfold the cultural and environmental destruction that are accompanying international politics in the Himalaya region in ways that analyze the region in a holistic manner as the local people and their environment as dependent variables of one another [2].

A: Citizenship and Identity in India-administered Kashmir After the Abrogation of Article 370

Kashmir is located between India, Pakistan, China, and Afghanistan within the Western Himalayas[23]. The region is governed by Pakistan and India who both claim full ownership of Kashmir[24]. Split between two governments with differing political systems and economic or social motivations, Kashmir is vulnerable to crises of regional identity and belonging. This was exasperated in 2019, when India-administered Kashmir’s longstanding autonomy was revoked by India’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in New Delhi. The abrogation of this constitutional clause threatens the social make up and self-identification of Kashmir which in turn affects the political stability of the region. In this paper I introduce the social and political impacts of the 2019 abrogation of Article 370 on the citizens of India-administered Kashmir and explore the situation as one of modern settler colonialism[25]. For India, Kashmir is potential for economic improvement and national pride. For Kashmir, a loss of autonomy is potential for the worsening of a regional identity crisis that has its roots in 70 years of political vulnerability.

Kashmir and the Abrogation of Article 370

Kashmir has been split politically between Pakistan and India since the partition of the Indian subcontinent and subsequent creation of Pakistan in 1947[24]. A Line of Control (LoC) has separated the territories since 1972 but both countries continue to claim full ownership of Kashmir. The northern and western portions of the region including Azad Kashmir, Gilgit, and Baltistan are administered by Pakistan while the southern and south-eastern portions of the region including Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, are controlled by India. China became involved in conflicts regarding Kashmir and assumed control over the north-eastern section of Ladakh in 1962. Multiple wars between Pakistan and India, two of the world’s most influential nuclear powers, have been fought over Kashmir. Article 370 in India’s constitution has granted long-term Kashmiri citizens certain privileges over Indian and other foreign individuals since 1947. Jobs were reserved for Kashmiris and property laws forbid ‘outsiders’ or non-permanent residents from owning property in the region. Kashmir enjoyed a level of autonomy with control over its own constitution and laws. Only foreign affairs, defence, and communications were out of India-administered Kashmiri hands. Economic, social, and political problems continued in Kashmir, but a level of autonomy allowed the region to have a say in its self-identification and governance. In 2019, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), led by Narendra Modi, abrogated Article 370 and revoked the status of Jammu and Kashmir to that of any other Indian state.

Kashmiri citizens are particularly concerned about the abrogation of Article 35-A within Article 370. This clause defined ‘permanent resident’ and offered housing and government employment privileges and priority to those within this category[26]. Without this, the population faces threats to their personhood and livelihood. Speaking to Al Jazeera, one Kashmiri explained that ‘this matter is related to the life and death of the people of Jammu and Kashmir’, and that they ‘are ready to spill [our] blood to safeguard this law’[5]. These feelings stem from the fear that the abrogation of Article 35-A is a direct attempt from the Indian government to alter the demographic of Kashmir and facilitate the replacement of Kashmiris with Indian citizens[26]. Prior to 2019, 100% of Kashmir’s top bureaucrats had Kashmiri origins[27]. Within one month of the constitutional change, over half of these positions were held by non-Kashmiris. The principal concern, however, is the apparent desire of New Delhi to dilute the Muslim population in Kashmir and force the region into assimilation[26]. Also within the first month of change, 25,000 ‘outsiders’ were granted full citizenship rights in Kashmir by Modi’s government[27]. Kashmir has been Muslim majority since 1346 when Muslim leadership took over from a succession of Hindu dynasties[24]. Although Jammu and Kashmir is home to a combination of Hindu, Buddhist, and Sikh populations, it has consistently been India’s only Muslim majority state[28]. As one of the oldest Muslim populations in the Indian subcontinent, regional identity and belonging in Kashmir is inseparable from Muslim faith. State attempts at changing this demographic and disregarding the wishes of Muslim Kashmiris contribute to the region-wide identity crisis. Now an occupied territory under settler colonialism, Kashmir is entering a period of significant political, and potentially, cultural vulnerability[29].

The change in citizenship laws did, however, offer opportunity to previously marginalised communities in Kashmir. Hindu refugees seeking official citizenship since 1947 were kept disenfranchised under Article 35-A and so benefitted from the 2019 change[27]. It is important to note that communities such as these are included in the official statistics of ‘new’ Kashmiri citizens and are often used in Kashmiri media outlets to over emphasise the apparent rapid changes in population demographics.

Article 370 and the Economy

The removal of autonomy and power of self-governance that came with the abrogation of Article 370 was motivated also by the potential of growth of economic power[23]. Infrastructure and ideas of national development were among the leading motivations for the BJPs attempts to further integrate Kashmir into the Indian Union. Kashmir’s abundance of natural resources aids the Indian extractive economy while enabling further state control over the Kashmiri population. As the Indian economy benefits, the Kashmiri economy suffers as the continual threat of conflict focuses the population less on economic productivity and more on survival[30]. Tunnels, roads, and bridges forcibly attach Kashmir to India while mobility controls such as wires, checkpoints, and military camps transform familiar places into zones of isolation and confinement[23]. The combination of physical integration and emotional isolation contributes to the shared regional crisis of identity.


In the post-British and European Empire era that the world has only recently entered, ideas of coloniality in the West are often considered something of the past. However, as the world witnesses the total destruction caused by the settler coloniality of Israel’s occupation of Palestine, and as Kashmir enters a new era as an occupied territory, we are reminded of the ongoing influence of colonial powers worldwide. The region-wide identity crisis faced by Kashmir since the revocation of the region’s constitutional rights has the potential to exasperate political vulnerability in both India-administered and Pakistan-administered Kashmir as new leadership and the reaction to it becomes increasingly destructive[31].

C: Political Vulnerability and the Preservation of Cultural Heritage in Northwest India

Northwest India is a region of the Western Himalayas; it is characterized by its rich cultural diversity which is home to numerous indigenous communities with distinct languages, traditions, and belief systems. However, this diversity is under threat due to various socio-political factors, including insurgency, ethnic conflicts, and neglect by the central government. This section aims to further examine the negative effects of political instability on the preservation of this culture and provide insight into the challenges faced by these communities in order to generate discussions on how to protect their invaluable cultural legacy.

Northwest India and Cultural Knowledge

The states of Northwest India (coloured in).

Northwest India generally consists of the states: Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana, Uttarakhand, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Ladakh, Jammu and Kashmir, and the National Capital Territory of Delhi. These communities are home to an array of indigenous knowledges, practices, art, and belief systems. For example, Himachal Pradesh is renowned for its rich tradition of folk music and dance, including the vibrant celebrations of the Kullu Dussehra and the rhythmic movements of the Nati dance[32]. Similarly, Punjab is celebrated for its lively Bhangra dance, colorful festivals such as Vaisakhi, and the profound spiritual teachings of Sikhism emanating from its sacred Golden Temple in Amritsar[33]. The newly formed Union Territory of Ladakh, nestled amidst the towering peaks of the Himalayas, boasts a rich tapestry of Tibetan Buddhist culture, reflected in its monasteries, festivals, and traditional handicrafts[34]. In addition to art, dances, and religious monuments, these states also possess important indigenous knowledges. These knowledges represent the accumulated wisdom passed down through generations among local residents[35]. In Himachal Pradesh, their generations of information allow them to sustain their livelihoods in an environmentally conscious way while facing challenges such as harsh weather conditions and limited resources in remote and isolated areas[35]. The states of Northwest India serve as a melting pot of diverse traditions, religions, and artistic expressions, shaping the cultural landscape of Northwest India and contributing to its dynamic identity.

Cultural Preservation and Political Vulnerability

Cultural preservation refers to “the efforts and practices aimed at protecting and maintaining the cultural heritage, traditions, knowledge, artifacts, and practices of a particular group, community, or society”[36]. These actions serve to maintain the unique identities of communities, allow them to pass on their traditions, values, and customs from one generation to the next; it involves the protection of historical sites, documents, and artifacts that offer insights into the past and facilitate an understanding of the evolution of human civilizations[36]. Cultural preservation also promotes diversity by acknowledging and celebrating the distinctions between various groups which cultivate tolerance, understanding, and respect for other cultures, leading to a more inclusive and harmonious society[36]. There are also economic benefits to preserving cultural heritage because it generates cultural tourism. Visitors often seek out destinations to immerse themselves in the distinctive culture, history, and traditions of the location which contributes to local economies[36]. In addition, cultural preservation provides valuable opportunities for education and research. Scholars, historians, and researchers can delve into the past, gaining insights into diverse cultures and societies, and thereby enriching our collective understanding of humanity's shared history[36]. Furthermore, cultural preservation is deeply intertwined with the spiritual and social aspects of a community's life. It ensures the continuation of rituals, ceremonies, and practices that hold profound significance for its members, reinforcing communal bonds and sustaining cultural identity[36].

Political instability disrupts these efforts and practices of cultural preservation in significant ways. In regions affected by political turmoil, the resources and attention needed to protect and maintain cultural heritage are often diverted towards addressing immediate security concerns or resolving political conflicts[37]. This diversion of resources can lead to neglect and underfunding of cultural preservation initiatives, resulting in the deterioration or loss of invaluable cultural artifacts, historical sites, and traditional practices. In addition, the breakdown of social cohesion caused by political instability can weaken the transmission of cultural knowledge and traditions from one generation to the next. Displacement, violence, and insecurity may force communities to abandon their cultural practices or adapt them to survive in hostile environments. As a result, the continuity of certain cultural beliefs and values may be lost, leading to the extinction of various cultural identities and traditions. For example, the state of Uttarakhand was created because of the mass regional mobilization that demanded political autonomy from its parent state Uttar Pradesh[38]. However, this separation provoked arguments about the right to perform certain ritual practices such as animal sacrifices[38]. The shifting political trends in Uttarakhand have influenced relationships between people, animals, and ideas about nature, shaping cultural practices[38]. Moreover, political instability can exacerbate intergroup tensions and conflicts, further threatening cultural diversity and heritage. Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, and other local traditions are widely practiced in India, and political conflicts only add to hostility between religious groups[37]. Ethnic strife, sectarian violence, and displacement often target cultural symbols and institutions, resulting in the destruction of sacred sites, monuments, and artifacts. The loss of these cultural treasures not only erases important links to the past but also deepens divisions within society which hinders efforts to promote tolerance, understanding, and respect for cultural differences. Political instability poses significant challenges to the preservation of cultural heritage by minimizing resources, disrupting social order, and heightening intergroup conflicts. Addressing political instability and promoting peace and stability are crucial steps towards ensuring the continued protection and transmission of Northwest India's diverse cultural heritage for future generations.


Political stability is not a luxury but a necessity for the preservation of cultural heritage in Northwest India. Sustainable peace and security are essential prerequisites for creating an enabling environment where indigenous communities can thrive and celebrate their cultural diversity. It is crucial to recognize the intricate relationship between political stability and preserving the indigenous knowledges, practices, artistic expressions, and beliefs of Northwest India.

Gendered perspectives on political vulnerability in the Western Himalayas

The Western Himalayas, encompassing regions within India and bordering Pakistan, present a unique geopolitical landscape where the intricate interplay of political vulnerability and regional positionality significantly influences the lives of its inhabitants. This essay explores how these political dynamics specifically impact the embodied experiences of gender among the local populations, revealing how socio-political and economic vulnerabilities translate into gendered experiences. Drawing on a diverse range of scholarly research, this exploration highlights the profound effects of regional conflicts and political instability on gender roles and expectations within these communities.

[[File:Chipko movement.webp|thumb|An image showing women hugging a tree as a form of protest often seen as part of the Chipko movement]]
Women in Uttarakhand hugging a tree as apart of the Chipko movement

Gender and Regional Development - Ecofeminism

The intersection of gender with broader political dialogues and development initiatives profoundly influences the socio-economic fabric of the Western Himalayas. Recent research highlights the pivotal role of women in political and environmental movements, challenging the marginalization of their contributions in mainstream narratives.[39] According to Gururani, gender should be understood as a performative and relational process, intricately woven through various societal structures like patriarchy, the economy, family, community, and state.[39] She convincingly argues against simplistic and traditional notions that either idealize women as natural guardians of the environment or confine them to domestic roles. Instead, she highlights how women's activism in Uttarakhand's autonomy movement is rooted in a complex mix of issues including livelihood, rights, and social justice, which both challenge and maintain traditional gender norms.[39]

Ecofeminism in India integrates environmental concerns with feminist issues, focusing on how caste, class, and gender intersect with ecological struggles. This perspective is vividly illustrated by the Chipko movement, where women played a pivotal role in environmental conservation efforts.[40] The Chipko movement, originating in the 1970s in the Garhwal Himalayas, was primarily a forest conservation action, with village women at its heart. These women embraced trees to prevent logging, symbolizing a profound connection between women and nature—a hallmark of ecofeminist ideology. [40].

Shrestha, Joshi, and Clement (2019) shed light on the male-dominated nature of sectors like hydropower projects, revealing how this dominance perpetuates gender hierarchies and overlooks women's contributions during project planning and execution.[41] Shrestha, Joshi, and Clement (2019) employed a feminist political ecology approach to analyze the gender dynamics within hydropower organizations in India. Their methodology involved conducting detailed fieldwork, including semi-structured, in-depth interviews with staff across various levels of two hydropower development organizations.[41] The authors purposefully selected interview participants to ensure a representation across different hierarchies and disciplines within the organizations.Their analysis highlights how organizational structures and cultural norms within hydropower organizations promote and reinforce a "blatant culture of masculinity"​​.[41] These structures and norms not only marginalize women but also create an environment where their contributions are undervalued and largely ignored. The authors argue that these male-dominated settings result in a work culture where vulnerabilities, inequalities, and gender disparities are seen as incompatible objectives, thereby sidelining efforts to incorporate or recognize women’s contributions fully​​.[41] This exclusion extends to the implementation of gender toolkits and other measures intended to foster gender equality within the sector, which often fail to penetrate the deeply ingrained masculine culture of these organizations​​.

Moreover, Padmátsho and Sarah Jocoby (2020) emphasize the importance of understanding how gendered interpretations of religious texts influence women's participation in public and political spheres. These insights emphasize the imperative of comprehending gender dynamics to address broader issues of development and political change in the region. Economic marginalization not only reinforces gender inequalities but also translates into political disenfranchisement, as economic power often determines political influence and social stability. Padma’tsho & Jacoby's (2020) examination of gender equality within Tibetan Buddhist contexts provides additional insights, highlighting the cultural nuances that shape political engagement and activism.

Economic Disparities and Political Vulnerability

Persistent economic disparities in the Western Himalayas contribute significantly to political vulnerability, particularly for women. Kumar's (2016) study reveals a substantial gender gap in employment, exacerbated by seasonal work patterns and limited awareness of government initiatives among rural women.[42] Kumar (2016) provides detailed statistics on the working populations in different states within the Western Himalayas, illustrating significant gender disparities in employment and economic opportunities. The author employed a quantitative methodology using secondary data analysis. He gathered data from the cencus of India (2011), focusing on the working-class population segmented by gender, caste and geographical background.The data shows that despite various government empowerment programs, women remain economically disadvantaged, with fewer opportunities for stable employment.[42] This economic marginalization is exacerbated by the region’s political instability, which often limits women’s access to resources and opportunities for advancement.[42]

Despite challenges, women's activities contribute to the sustainability of agricultural and forest resources. According to the article, "Gender and Forest Commons of the Western Indian Himalayas: A Case Study of Differences", women's role is crucial in managing and protecting common property resources in the Kulu Valley, Himachal Pradesh. Women, particularly from upper castes, play a significant role in decision-making through organizations like the Mahila Mandal,[43] while lower caste women often face exclusion. Kerril Davidson-Hunt employed a combination of qualitative methodologies to explore the role of women in the management and use of common property resources in the Kulu Valley. The research predominantly utilizes structured interviews conducted with women from two villages to gather detailed accounts of their involvement in regulating and protecting village forests.[43] The study's exposition on how women's management of these resources is stratified by caste and economic status can be tied to the broader theme of political vulnerability. It illustrates a microcosm of larger political dynamics where marginalized groups often have limited access to resources and decision-making processes. This dynamic increases their vulnerability in politically unstable or conflict-prone areas, as they are less able to secure resources needed for resilience and economic stability.

Religon and Gender Identity

Padmátsho and Sarah Jacoby (2020) emphasize the importance of understanding how gendered interpretations of religious texts influence women's participation in public and political spheres.[44] These insights emphasize the imperative of comprehending gender dynamics to address broader issues of development and political change in the region. Padma’tsho & Jacoby's (2020) examination of gender equality within Tibetan Buddhist contexts provides additional insights, highlighting the cultural nuances that shape political engagement and activism.[44] Their research methodology centered around detailed fieldwork and interviews conducted at Larung Gar Buddhist Academy. This approach allowed them to capture the nuanced religious and cultural practices and their impact on women's roles within both religious and broader community contexts. Their work reveals how the redefinition of women's roles within religious practices in Tibet offers a powerful lens to view the broader implications of gender dynamics on political vulnerabilities in the Western Himalayas. This reframing within religious communities can serve as a microcosm for broader societal shifts towards recognizing and integrating women's contributions in political and public spheres, potentially mitigating the political vulnerabilities that arise from gendered disparities.

In conclusion, the exploration of political vulnerability in the Western Himalayas reveals its profound impact on gender dynamics, influencing women's roles across social, economic, and environmental spheres. This essay has highlighted how political instability intersects with gender, exacerbating disparities and affecting participation in development and environmental activism. Scholarly research, including studies on ecofeminism and economic inequalities, underscores the need to integrate gender perspectives to fully address the region's challenges and opportunities for sustainable development.

Linguistic Realities and Political Vulnerability in the Western Himalayas

A map showing the regions of India by their most commonly spoken language.

The geopolitics of the Himalayan region have cemented it as a hotspot for linguistic, cultural, and religious diversity,[37] with the region housing 1/6 of all human language.[45] In India alone, estimates suggest that over seventeen hundred languages are spoken—depending on how one classifies "language."[46] It was the vision of India’s first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, that India become a secular state encompassing a diversity of religious, linguistic, and cultural identities.[7] This distinctly contrasted Pakistan’s first Prime Minister, Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s, aim to build a country founded on Muslim faith and homogenous identity.[7] This has resulted in a contemporary India which has two official and twenty-two scheduled languages, and Pakistan which gives status on an official level only to Urdu and English.[46][7] The differing language ideologies of India and Pakistan are succinctly highlighted in the ongoing conflict over Kashmir. The following sections will track a brief history of the primary languages spoken in the Western Himalayas, culminating in an exploration of how language has intertwined with the political vulnerability of Kashmir.

A Brief History Of Primary Western Himalayan Languages

There has always been extraordinary linguistic diversity in India and Pakistan which can be seen in the several languages which held primacy in the time before Partition. In the first millennium CE, Sanskrit was the primary language of instruction for upper class men and it retains religious significance today despite being the first language of approximately twenty-five thousand people in India.[46] Eventually, the primary language of communication shifted from Sanskrit to Persian which remained prominent from the thirteenth to the eighteenth century.[46] The arrival of the British in the seventeenth century marked the beginning of the most noteworthy regional shift of recent times — the introduction of English.[46] English became, and remains today, a language of communication for elite Indian and Pakistani individuals to be educated in and to work in.[46][8] English maintains official recognition in both India and Pakistan, but is not a first language for the majority of the region's population. The consistent increase in the prominence of English can be attributed to heightened career opportunities associated with proficiency in the language, which holds considerable prestige in India, Kashmir, and Pakistan.[46][47][48] Aside from English and Hindi, there are twenty-two scheduled languages in India, sixteen of which have official status at the regional level, and countless other Indigenous languages which do not have status.[46] In Pakistan, there are at least seventy-seven languages spoken including eleven “provincial languages.” [8] Taking into consideration that the Himalayas are home to four hundred fifteen languages which have less than one hundred thousand speakers, it is unsurprising that such extensive diversity should exist. [49] After Partition occurred in 1947, India adopted Hindi and English as official federal languages and Pakistan adopted Urdu and English. The conflict between Urdu and Hindi is best explored through the case study of Kashmir.

Hindi, Urdu, and the Contestation of Kashmir

Over five hundred thousand people in India speak a dialect of Hindi as their native language and it is a primary language of the Northwestern part of the country, including places such as Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh.[46] Modern Standard Hindi and Modern Standard Urdu diverged from each other as Hindi speakers began to add in Sanskrit words to replace those borrowed from Arabic and Persian in religiously-motivated attempt to separate two highly similar languages.[46] The scripts were also differentiated, with Hindi adopting Devanagari script, rendering the written forms of the languages mutually unintelligible.[46] [7] Hindu people began this differentiation in response to the British adopting Urdu as their local language of communication, with the increase in Sanskrit words being an attempt to assert Hindu presence. Muslim scholars responded by adding more Persian and Arabic words to Urdu and the pre-existing contestations between the faiths were heightened.

Post-Partition India and Pakistan adopted vastly different ideologies which have influenced their language policies and their relations to Kashmir. Prime Minister Nehru continued with his plan to promote linguistic independence and an official language was not originally imposed by the Indian government, leaving Kashmir with the highest linguistic diversity in India.[46] Part of Kashmir's diversity can be attributed to Kashmiryiat, a Kashmiri indigenous concept of harmonious religious and linguistic existence, which unfortunately proved difficult in practice;[48] Urdu became the mandatory language of education after Partition and was implemented by Kashmiri leadership despite claiming intent to promote local languages.[7] This is not wholly dissimilar to Azad Kashmir where Urdu is the official language of Pakistan and is heavily promoted in an effort to uplift a homogenous identity.[8][7] At the time of partition, only 5% of the Pakistani population spoke Urdu as their first language, but Prime Minister Jinnah’s vision of a Muslim nation hinged on a language he associated with the faith.[7] Kashmir developed into a symbolic tool for Indian and Pakistani governments to exercise their differing philosophies. Kashmiri people in Azad Kashmir resent the imposition of Urdu by the Pakistani government, but Kashmiris in Indian occupied areas resent the increasing presence of the Indian government despite their guise of multiculturalism— as evidenced by the use of Urdu as a tool to promote a Muslim identity in Indian and Pakistani occupied areas.[7] This leaves Kashmir in a tumultuous position, and it remains highly influenced by the region’s political vulnerability.

Contemporary Language Use in Kashmir

After Article 370 was abrogated, the situation of Jammu and Kashmir became increasingly vulnerable to Indian influence and in 2020 the official languages of Kashmiri, Dogri, and Hindi were added to Urdu and English as regional languages.[50] It is approximated that less than 0.17% of people in Jammu and Kashmir speak English or Urdu, whereas over half speak Kashmiri.[50] The persistence of Kashmiri language is a testament to the impressive resilience of Kashmiri people in the face of extreme vulnerability and low agency. In Azad Kashmir, Urdu remains the official language and English remains prominent in higher level affairs. Language use remains tumultuous in the region as people fight to revitalize Indigenous languages and carry them on to future generations. In a region that remains politically vulnerable, and where English is continuing to impose, time will tell which languages gain enough institutional support to persist in an area still feeling the influence of British, Pakistani, and Indian colonization.

L: Economic Vulnerability in Western Himalaya

The North Western Himalaya, spanning parts of northern India and Pakistan, is a region marked by its majestic landscapes and rich cultural heritage. However, the region also grapples with significant economic and political challenges. Economic vulnerability in the North Western Himalaya is intertwined with political vulnerabilities that stem from governance issues, regional conflicts, and policy uncertainties, such as the innate challenges between public and private investment sectors. The area's complex terrain and remoteness hinder access to markets and essential services, making the local economy heavily reliant on agriculture. As well, the agricultural sector is largely at risk due to climate change, such as rises in temperature leading to a decrease in good crops. Political instability and tensions, including security concerns and disputes over territorial control, further exacerbate economic hardships by disrupting development and deterring investment. This essay will examine the interconnected nature of economic and political vulnerabilities in the North Western Himalaya, exploring how these factors impact the lives and livelihoods of the region's inhabitants and considering the importance of household economies and sustainable development.

Policy and Governance Issues

Ever since India declared its independence, they have strived to become one the great countries of power, much like the USA has done[51]. Following the Cold War, India has successfully had one of the fastest growing economies and, as of 2019, is regarded as having one of the largest global economies within a nominal context[51]. There have been a number of positive areas of growth within India's economy, though there has been a significant impact on investment in India through the related governance. Around 1996, the country became open to foreign capital[52], which refers to the inflow of capital in one's home country through international means. This led to much optimism within the country, especially in 2007 when India's economy rose 9% at an annual rate[52], though much like any economic boom, there was a subsequent crash. This is why many scholars alike follwing the economy are yet to celebrate the country’s 2023 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth of 8.4% due to the trend being inconsistent in the past years[52].

As of right now India is focusing on reducing their inherent dependence on “conventional energy" in an attempt to mitigate climate change[53]. The government is essentially aiming to push the use of renewable energy and create a new domestic base for renewables[53]. This has been difficult as it is clear that renewable power is much more expensive, 50% more expensive[53], than the usual more conventional power used in India. Because of this rise in cost, the policy changes need to be policy support on both state and federal levels[53].

The relationship between both private investment and government investment has become extremely controversial. After India’s independence, the government's concentration on improving their economic growth was a priority[54]. This was hoped to be done through state led strategies that would result in rapid industrialization through different industries that were capital intensive[54]. Adding to the country’s interest in areas of public investment, such as agriculture and infrastructure, there is now the competition of the private investment sectors that are composed of both commercial and industrial enterprises. India’s public investment sector is mostly dominated by agricultural productivity and the subsequent investments are used to improve it through the accumulation of public capital[55]. The accumulation is designed to increase the production of farmers and usually have immediate effects[55]. The private investment sector faces a variety of obstacles because the system that regulates them is innately complex[54][55], due to foreign trade, licensing, credit allocation schemes[54]. In 1991, many reforms withdrew much of the involvement of the commercial and industrial enterprises in the public sector, fortunately, the public sector remained a crucial part of India’s economy [54][55].

Environmental Challenges and Agricultural Dependence

The impact of climate change is extremely threatening to all ecosystems and the sustainability of all walks of life[56]. This has led to policy makers around worldwide to focus on reducing the effects that pose serious threats in order to alleviate risk[56]. India has an incredibly diverse geographical landscape and more than half the country’s population relies on the agricultural resources for employment[57] making it one of the most critical players in India’s economy.

The Indus River Basin without any of the boundaries of the disputed regions

The importance of these kinds of resources for the wellbeing of India can not go unnoticed. Things like livestock and water plants are important occupations that the government uses to help maintain the agricultural infrastructure[58]. Though the government still interferes with the natural resources such as rivers that inherently create international and geographical implications with the neighbouring countries. For example, the Indian government even “fast-tracked” a hydropower project in 2017 upon the rivers in the Indus legion of Kashmir, This particular territory is divided between India, Pakistan, and China, though it is claimed entirely by India and Pakistan[58].

One of the most prevalent effects of climate is the increased rise in temperature that leads to not only the decay of many ecosystems and vegetation but also the general population[57]. This rise in temperature can also lead to insufficient rainfall that can result in uprising and poor agricultural accumulation[57]. Economically this is disastrous, as the ramifications of climate change pose a threat to productivity, labour, trade, and supply and demand[57]. Because of the heavy reliance on farming communities, the change in temperature and precipitation directly affect farming outcomes[57]. Agriculture in India is an incredibly vulnerable industry, especially in rural areas[55][56]. Many investments in agriculture within the scope of the public sector, such as irrigation, are also investments in education, and health[55]. This is because these investments contribute to production and poverty reduction in these rural areas[55]. Now with that in mind, the vulnerability of this sector is at risk with labour productivity going down due to heat related tensions[56]. With this drop in productivity, India could potentially account for 34 million in global job losses due to heat by 2023[55].

Tourism Economy and Socio-economic Implications

In regions such as Himachal Pradesh, tourism has good potential on the state economy, especially with the numerous hiking routes[59]. In the last few decades, the governments of India have focused on promoting tourism within the country in hopes of it becoming one of the primary sectors leading to economic growth[59]. With that, there has been a steady increase in tourism in India over the past few years, with the rate growing from 1.94 million to 13.26 million from 1990 to 2010[59]. In the early 1990s, an economic policy reform was put into place as a response to the very serious fiscal and balance of payment crisis that was happening at the time[60], though reforms of this stature tend to move at a very slow pace because all states initiated many reforms[60]. When it comes to socio-economic development, the focus on the population's access to healthcare is inherently important. Improved health status for all individuals is a massive indicator for development and positive livelihood and also it becomes an important factor in the context of economic development[61].

H: Technology and Cybersecurity

Map of Jammu and Kashmir by National Geographic in 1946. This region has been subject to dispute between India and Pakistan, thus the shift towards technological advancement in the area comes with many challenges and the need for increased cybersecurity measures.


In the Western Himalayas, technology and cybersecurity are not merely topics of academic interest but are important factors impacting the socio-economic and geopolitical state of the region. This area, characterized by its rugged terrain and complex international borders, presents unique challenges and opportunities for technological advancement. As digital connectivity becomes increasingly vital for development, the need for unbreachable cybersecurity measures grows. This is especially true given the region's sensitivity due to ongoing territorial disputes and its geopolitical significance. This section will analyze how the dynamics of technology adoption and cybersecurity are shaped by these regional characteristics, drawing upon both academic literature and news articles to show the intersection of technology, policy, and regional security challenges.

Technology and Infrastructure

The Western Himalayas, a region rich with historical and geopolitical significance, encompassing areas like Kashmir and Ladakh, is currently undergoing an important transformation. The introduction of advanced technologies and infrastructure projects such as the Udhampur-Srinagar-Baramulla Rail Link is an important example of this change. This project particularly aims to connect countless regions in the Himalayas with the country of India and aims to be accessible in all types of weather. These developments are not only crucial for improving logistical capabilities of the region but also for ensuring the security and operational efficiency of these strategic assets. Moreover, the Jammu & Kashmir Infrastructure Development Finance Corporation (JKIDFC) has been working on integrating technology across many sectors of work. This integration aims to enhance public service delivery, increase transportation safety, and improve overall socio-economic conditions in the region. Such initiatives have been introduced in the recent years and are key components of a broader strategy aimed at using modern infrastructure to drive regional development [62][63].

Due to the increased use of technology, in the politically sensitive area of Kashmir, there is a growing need for strong cybersecurity measures. This region faces distinct challenges, such as the risk of cyber-attacks that can disrupt essential services and leak sensitive information for many political parties. Strengthening cybersecurity here is crucial not just for protection but also for ensuring the area's overall stability and maintaining public trust.

An image of solar panels in the Jammu and Kashmir region, taken by Kiran Jonnalagadda. From energy and telecommunications to cybersecurity and surveillance, the region is rapidly adapting and becoming more technologically advanced due to socioeconomic growth and diplomatic tensions.

Additionally, with the rise of digital communication, there is also an increased risk of misinformation, which can heighten tensions in this volatile region. Effective cybersecurity measures are vital for securing infrastructure and controlling the spread of false information. Efforts to improve cybersecurity include raising awareness among the public and institutions about cyber risks, enhancing technological defenses, and enforcing strict cybersecurity policies. Furthermore, building international partnerships can provide Kashmir with access to better cybersecurity resources and knowledge, strengthening its defenses against cyber threats. Creating a dedicated cybersecurity team can centralize efforts to quickly monitor and respond to cyber incidents, keeping the region’s digital environment secure against potential threats [64].

Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts of Infrastructure and Technology

While the push towards modernization offers numerous economic benefits, it also introduces several challenges. Infrastructure projects, such as the expansion of road networks and the enhancement of telecommunications systems, while designed to improve connectivity and foster economic growth, frequently have detrimental effects on local ecosystems and community ways of life. For example, road construction projects can lead to habitat fragmentation and increased environmental pollution.

Similarly, the expansion of telecommunications infrastructure might inadvertently alter social dynamics and economic practices in traditionally remote communities. It is crucial, therefore, to develop and implement policies that balance technological and economic advancements with the preservation of environmental integrity and cultural heritage. This balance can be achieved theough assessments to measure the environmental impact and by creating proactive community engagement initiatives. These strategies will help ensure that development projects are harmonious with the needs and values of local populations, promoting sustainable growth that benefits all political parties involved [65].

Utilizing Technology for Diplomatic Engagement and Conflict Resolution

The additional of technology tries to alleviate some of the political vulnerability in the Himalayan region while still maintaining a high tension state. Advancements of technologies such as satellite imagery, communication intercepts, and cyber surveillance are essential are becoming increasingly essential followed by the need for better monitoring mechanisms [23]. These technologies are instrumental in overseeing treaty compliance and supporting diplomatic engagements, which are very important for maintaining regional peace. By enhancing situational awareness, they allow countries to respond proactively to emerging issues before they escalate into conflicts.

Additionally as stated, the strategic deployment of these technologies emphasizes the necessity of strong cybersecurity measures to protect the digital infrastructure that holds together key economic and administrative operations. Ensuring the security of these systems is critical not only for preventing disruptions but also for sustaining political stability in this vulnerable region. Resilient cybersecurity protocols are needed to safeguard sensitive communications and data from cyber threats, contributing significantly to the overall security of these Himalayan states. This approach highlights the dual importance of technological advancement in both diplomatic and security domains, essential for fostering a stable and continuous development path for the region [1].


The Western Himalayas are currently undergoing significant changes due to new technology and infrastructure projects. These developments are not just improving roads and communications but are also making it crucial to focus on cybersecurity to keep these advancements safe. Balancing these new benefits with their challenges is key to making sure that the region can grow in a stable and positive way.

Example Citation here


This resource was created by the UBC Wiki Community.
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Davis, Alexander (2018). "Thawing Tensions in The Himalaya".
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Davis, A. E., Gamble, R., Roche, G., & Gawne, L. (2021). International relations and the Himalaya: connecting ecologies, cultures and geopolitics. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 75(1), 15–35.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Barrett and Bosak, Kimiko and Keith (2018). "The Role of Place in Adapting to Climate Change: A Case Study from Ladakh, Western Himalayas". MDPI.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Shukla, Roopam; et al. (January 2019). "Climate change perception: an analysis of climate change and risk perceptions among farmer types of Indian Western Himalayas". CrossMark. Explicit use of et al. in: |last= (help); Explicit use of et al. in: |first= (help)
  5. 5.0 5.1 Fareed, Rifat (August 2018). "Kashmir: Tension rises as citizenship rights law under threat". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 14.04.2024. Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Sahrai, N., & Javaid, U. (2016). Conflict management between Pakistan and India: Challenges and failures. South Asian Studies, 31(01), 245-256.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 Hill, Matthew; Motwani, Nishank (2017). "Language, Identity and Security in India-Pakistan Relations: The case of Kashmir". Journal of South Asian Studies. 40: 123–45.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Manan, Syed Abdul; Channa, Liaquat Ali; Tul-Kubra, Khadija; David, Maya Khemlani (2021). [DOI: 10.1111/ijal.12340 "Ecological planning towards language revitalization: The Torwali minority language in Pakistan"] Check |url= value (help). International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 31: 438–457 – via John Wiley & Sons.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Sirur, Simrin (March 11th 2024). "Western Himalayas more "risk prone" than the East, according to new index". Mongabay. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Kikon, Dolly (2019). Living With Oil and Coal: resource political and militarization in northeast India. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Khadka, Navin Singh (March 12th 2023). "Is India-China race to build damaging the Himalayas?". BBC World Service. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 "Climate change adding layers of vulnerability to fragile Himalayas". Business Standard. July 23rd 2022. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 Gyal, Huaste (2019). "Our Indigenous Land in Not a Wasteland". American Ethnologist.
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 Das and Mishra, Suraj and Anindya (2023). [10.1007/s13280-022-01810-3 "Climate change and the Western Himalayan community: Exploring the local perspective through food choices"] Check |url= value (help). PMC.
  15. Warner, Cameron; et al. (October 14, 2015). "Introduction: Aftershocked". Society for Cultural Anthropology. Explicit use of et al. in: |last= (help); Explicit use of et al. in: |first= (help)
  16. Shneiderman, Sara (October 14, 2015). "Dots on the Map: Anthropological Locations and Responses to Nepal's Earthquakes". Society for Cultural Anthropology.
  17. 17.0 17.1 Kapruwan, Ritika (January 2024). "Household livelihood resilience of pastoralists and smallholders to climate change in Western Himalaya, India". Retrieved April 20. Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
  18. 18.0 18.1 Vikram, Negi; et al. (Feb 2017). "Climate change impact in the Western Himalaya: people's perception and adaptive strategies". ProQuest. Explicit use of et al. in: |last= (help); Explicit use of et al. in: |first= (help)
  19. 19.0 19.1 Chakravorty, P. (2017). Sino-Indian War of 1962. Indian Historical Review, 44(2), 285-312.
  20. 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 Pardesi, M.S. India’s China strategy under Modi continuity in the management of an asymmetric rivalry. Int Polit 59, 44–66 (2022).
  21. Vox Borders. 28 November 2017. “Building a border at 4,600 meters.”
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 Amusan, T. (n.d.). The belt and road initiative’s impact depends on the recipient country . – The Diplomat.,the%20livelihood%20of%20local%20communities.
  23. 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 Bhan, Mona (2020). "Infrastructures of occupation: Mobility, immobility, and the politics of integration in Kashmir". Kashmir and the future of South Asia: 71–90.
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 Britannica (2024). "Kashmir". Britannica. Retrieved 06.04.2024. Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
  25. Harvard Law Review (2021). "From Domicile to Dominion: India's Settler Colonial Agenda in Kashmir". Harvard Law Review. 134.
  26. 26.0 26.1 26.2 "What's Article 370? What to know about India top court verdict on Kashmir". Al Jazeera. December 2023. Retrieved 14.04.2024. Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
  27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 Mir, Hilal (June 2020). "India grants thousands citizenship rights in Kashmir". AA. Retrieved 14.04.2024. Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
  28. Khan, Mohammad Ishaq (1996). "Kashmiri Muslims: Social and Identity Consciousness". Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East. 16: 25–38.
  29. Shrestha, Nanda (1995). Becoming a Development Category in Power of Development. Routledge. ISBN 9780203975985.
  30. Ahanger, Javid Ahmad (2019). "The chronic conflict over Kashmir". The Journal of International Issues. 23(2).
  31. Rai, Shneiderman, Janak, Sara (2019). 'Identity, Society, and State: Citizenship and Inclusion in Nepal' in The Politics of Change: Reflections on Contemporary Nepal. Nepal: Himal Books for Social Science Baha and The Asia Foundation. pp. 83–108. ISBN 978 9937 597 53 1.
  32. Singh, Vijjika (2014). "Dussehra Festival: Situating the Cult of Rama in the Kullu Valley". International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention 3. No. 6: 52–53.
  33. Schreffler, Gibb (2013). "Situating Bhangra Dance: A Critical Introduction". South Asian History and Culture 4. No. 3: 384–412.
  34. Debreczny, Karl; Pakhoutova, Elena (Accessed April 12, 2024). "Himalayan Art and Cross-Cultural Exchange". Check date values in: |date= (help)
  35. 35.0 35.1 Rawat, Dhiraj S.; Kharwal, Anjna D. (2016). "Folk knowledge on indigenous practices in North-West Himalaya with special reference to Himachal Pradesh (HP), India". Folk 1. No. 8.
  36. 36.0 36.1 36.2 36.3 36.4 36.5 Priyanka, Roy; Maji, Saikat; Singh, Prashish (2023). "Preserving Indigenous Technical Knowledge: The Need for Documentation and Cultural Preservation in the Context of North-East India". Food and Scientific Reports. 4: 10–17.
  37. 37.0 37.1 37.2 Davis, Alexander; Gawne, Lauren; Roche, Gerald; Gamble, Ruth (October 22, 2018). "Thawing tensions in the Himalaya". theinterpreter.
  38. 38.0 38.1 38.2 Govindrajan, Radhika (2014). "How to Be Hindu in the Himalayas: Conflicts over Animal Sacrifice in Uttarakhand". Shifting Ground: People, Animals, and Mobility in India's Environmental History. Oxford Academic.
  39. 39.0 39.1 39.2 Gururani and Berry, Kim and Shubhra (Spring 2014). "Special section: Gender in the Himalaya" Check |url= value (help). HIMALAYA, the journal of the association for Nepal and Himalayan studies. Volume 34: 36–42.
  40. 40.0 40.1 Rao, Manisha (2023). "Ecofeminism at the crossroads in India: A review". Représentations Dans Le Monde Anglophone. 26: 134–138.
  41. 41.0 41.1 41.2 41.3 Shreshtha, Joshi and Clement, Gitta, Deepa and Floriane (2019). "Masculinities and Hydropower in India: A feminist political Ecology perspective". Uopen journals. Volume 13: 130–152.
  42. 42.0 42.1 42.2 Kumar, Sunil (winter 2016). "Economic perspective on women empowerment: A study on working class and gender disparity in Western Himalayan States of India". Indian journal of economic and development. Volume 4 issue 1: 1–7. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  43. 43.0 43.1 Davidson-hunt, Kerril (1996). "Gender and forest commons of the Western Indian Himalayas:A case study of differences". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  44. 44.0 44.1 Padmátsho and Jacoby, Baimacuo and Sarah (2020). "Gender Equality in and on Tibetan Nuns' terms". Religions. Volume 11 issue 10: 2–19.
  45. Turin, Mark (Spring 2007). "A Multitude of Mountain Voices" (PDF). Sustainable Mountain Development. 52: 11–13 – via DigitalHimalaya.
  46. 46.00 46.01 46.02 46.03 46.04 46.05 46.06 46.07 46.08 46.09 46.10 46.11 McLeod, John (2023). Modern India. Santa Barbara: Bloomsbury Collections. ISBN 979-8-400-68675-7.
  47. Karlsson, Bengt G.; Kikon, Dolly (2017). "Wayfinding: Indigenous Migrants in the Service Sector of Metropolitan India". South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies. 40: 447–462 – via Tandfonline.
  48. 48.0 48.1 Bhat, Faizaan (March 22, 2022). "Politics of Language: How Urdu Slowly Disappeared from Kashmir". OutlookIndia.
  49. Turin, Mark (2014). "Mother Tongues and Language Competence: The Shifting Politics of Linguistic Belonging in the Himalayas". Facing Globalization in the Himalayas: Belonging and the Politics of the Self. Governance, Conflict, and Civic Action. pp. 372–96.
  50. 50.0 50.1 Jain, Bharti (September 23, 2020). "J&K will have 5 official languages, Lok Sabha clears bill". Times of India.
  51. 51.0 51.1 Pardesi, Manjeet S. (2021). "India's China strategy under Modi continuity in the management of an asymmetric rivalry". International Politics. 59: 44–66.
  52. 52.0 52.1 52.2 "How fast is India's economy really growing?". The Economist. April 11th, 2024. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  53. 53.0 53.1 53.2 53.3 Shrimali, Gireesh; Srinivasan, Sandhya; Goel, Shobhit; Nelson, David (2017). "The effectiveness of federal renewable policies in India". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 70: 538–550.
  54. 54.0 54.1 54.2 54.3 54.4 Mitra, Pritha (May 2006). "Has Government Investment Crowded Out Private Investment in India?". American Economic Review. 96 (2): 337–341.
  55. 55.0 55.1 55.2 55.3 55.4 55.5 55.6 55.7 Fan, Shenggen; Gulati, Ashok; Thorat, Sukhadeo (August 2008). "Investment, subsidies, and pro-poor growth in rural India". Agricultural Economics. 39: 163–170.
  56. 56.0 56.1 56.2 56.3 Sultana, Nasrin (August 2023). "How climate change can impact GDP and jobs". Forbes. Retrieved April 15th, 2024. Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
  57. 57.0 57.1 57.2 57.3 57.4 Sandhani, Medhavi; Pattanayak, Anubhab; Kumar, K.S. (September 2020). "Impact of climate change on economic growth: a case study of India" (PDF). Madras School of Economics: 1–41.
  58. 58.0 58.1 Bhan, Mona (2020). "Infrastructures of Occupation". Kashmir and the Future of South Asia: 71–87.
  59. 59.0 59.1 59.2 Singh, R.B.; Kumar, Pankaj (January 2014). "Geographic and Socio-Economic Realities of Himachal Pradesh, Northwestern Himalaya". Livelihood Security in Northwestern Himalaya: 11–26.
  60. 60.0 60.1 Bajpai, Nirupam; Sachs, Jeffery D. (May 1996). "Trends in Inter-State Inequalities of Income in India". Earth Institute. Development Discussion Papers (58 ed.). Harvard Institute for International Development: 1–10.
  61. Iyengar, Shreekant; Dholakia, Ravindra H. (April 2012). "Acess of the Rural Poor to Primary Healthcare in India". Review of Market Integration. 4 (1): 1–130.
  62. Haider, Usman (October 24, 2023). "The Indian Army's Boosted Logistic Capabilities in Kashmir".
  63. "Jammu & Kashmir Infrastructure Development Finance Corporation completes over 1,500 projects worth over Rs 2,500 crore". January 11, 2023. |first= missing |last= (help)
  65. Gurung, Phurwa (2021). "Challenging infrastructural orthodoxies: Political and economic geographies of a Himalayan road". ScienceDirect.