Jump to content

Week 6

From UBC Wiki

1) Source

https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarwantsingh/2024/10/14/what-data-reveals-about-peak-oil-scenarios/


2) Problem

The environmental economic challenge described by this source involves transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energy while managing declining oil demand, impacting economies reliant on oil, and addressing climate change through reduced carbon emissions.


3) Summary

The concept of “peak oil” has sparked widespread debate, with predictions on its timing varying significantly. Some organizations project a peak around 2045, while the others suggests a peak between 2028 and 2035, driven by clean energy adoption. One of the sources referenced in the article estimates oil demand will peak around 2032-2035 before declining significantly by 2050. On the other hand, India's reliance on oil may prolong its peak until 2040 as a result of economic growth and industrial needs. As electric vehicles gain traction, oil demand for transportation is expected to decline. However, oil remains crucial in sectors like aviation and petrochemicals, where alternatives are limited. Government incentives for electric vehicles, like tax credits, support the transition but the energy sector must balance existing oil infrastructure with investments in renewables to avoid economic disruptions. The focus of the article is ultimately on the industries readiness to adapt to the reality of peak oil while avoiding severe economic consequences.


4) Economic Concepts

  1. Peak Oil: suggests that global oil production will reach a maximum point or "peak" after which production will steadily decline due to resource depletion. As oil becomes harder and more costly to extract, supplies will diminish, driving up prices of goods which in turn should encourage shifts toward alternative energy sources or shifts in technology.
  2. Negative Externalities: Negative externalities are unintended side effects of economic activities that affect primarily third parties who are not involved in the transaction or situation. Examples of this include pollution from factories, where the cost of environmental damage and health impacts is taken on by the people of society rather than the business who is doing the polluting.


5) Application of Concepts

Peak Oil is the central focus in the discussions within this article, as it explores differing predictions about when global oil demand might peak. The timing of “peak oil” is largely debated with some organizations expecting oil to remain a significant energy source until around 2045, while others predict a peak as early as 2025 to 2035. This divergence reflects the uncertainty surrounding the future of oil, as countries with varying economic needs, such as India, may not see peak oil until 2040. As countries transition to renewables, the challenge lies in managing the economic ramifications for industries and regions that depend on oil. The transition to cleaner energy sources must happen alongside strategic planning to avoid economic disruptions, especially in developing nations where oil plays a crucial role in supporting growth. Policymakers need to balance the immediate energy demands with long-term sustainability goals, ensuring that economic structures can adapt to the inevitable decline of oil.

Negative externalities are highlighted in the article through the environmental costs associated with continued fossil fuel use. As countries ramp up their renewable energy capacities, they must grapple with the health and ecological impacts of oil consumption, which often go unaccounted for in market pricing. The article suggests that, while oil demand may decline in certain sectors due to the rise of electric vehicles, it will continue to play a vital role in industries like aviation and petrochemicals. This reliance underscores the importance of internalizing negative externalities, such as pollution and climate change, through policies that incentivize cleaner alternatives. By addressing these external costs, governments can encourage a more sustainable energy transition that not only reduces reliance on oil but also improves public health and environmental outcomes, ultimately leading to a more balanced and resilient economy.


6) Conclusion

The Forbes article discusses the contentious "peak oil" concept, with predictions ranging from a peak around 2045 to as early as 2028-2035, driven by clean energy adoption. While oil demand may decline, countries like India may see their peak delayed until 2040 due to economic growth. Electric vehicles will reduce oil demand in transportation, but oil remains crucial in sectors like aviation and petrochemicals. The article emphasizes the need for strategic planning to balance existing oil infrastructure with renewable investments to mitigate economic disruptions and address the negative externalities associated with fossil fuel consumption.

Prof: In the text, and in class, our primary model for understanding the use of nonrenewable resources was the Hotelling model. In this model, the rate of return on the marginal net benefit from the nonrenewable resource - fossil fuels - must grow at the discount rate. How does this model map onto the peak oil projections?

A key prediction of the Hotelling model was that if the marginal cost of extracting the resource is constant, then the price should be increasing at the discount rate, and the amount of the resource used each period should be declining. The Hotelling model, in this simple form, does not have a peak. Why is this? A peak followed by a decline can show up in the Hotelling model if we consider declining marginal costs for extracting the resource and increasing demands for its use. Economic growth would result in growing demand, and technological progress would result in decreasing marginal extraction costs. However, since oil is finite, and since the lowest cost reserves are accessed first, at some point technological progress will not be able to further reduce the marginal cost of extracting oil. Technological progress is also reducing the cost of substitutes, which should slow, and perhaps even reverse, the increase in the demand for oil.