User talk:VanessaPutnam

From UBC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Critique010:19, 7 February 2018

The topic is relevant for the course. 5

  The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
  The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5
  The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 4
  The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5
  There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 5
  There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 3 (Although there wasn't pseudocode, given what you covered it wasn't really needed. Could be helpful if the page is expanded though.)
  It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
  It is correct. 5
  It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 3 (It would be nice to expand the page a bit. Maybe the page could expand by giving more examples on applications or adding some mathematics)
  It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 4 (This page could probably be split up a bit into a few different pages, each of the representative methods just be their own page. Although I do think the page works as a broad intro on its own as well.)
  It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5
  The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 5
  I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4
  This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 17 :D

10:19, 7 February 2018