email Oct 22 2015

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:00 PM, JF A <jenagyei@hotmail.com> wrote: Hello Kim and Mukunthanm

I think we should try and read the following 2 articles againt Insite:

Lessard article but have not read it, I think it oppose keeping Insite open.

And/or

The other option is “Factum of the appellants the Attorney General of Canada…” – that opposes keeping Insite open.

I have already read PHS community SS v Attorney General of Canada 2008, it supports keeping Insite open so we can used it in support of keeping Insite open

The above 3 articles should be enough to complete what we need to do in the assignment.

The assignment involves doing an outline of topics we would discuss or take into account if we are the judges presiding over the case. I thought an outlines involves outlining issues we would consider if we are/were the judges on the case using headings and subheadings to address the issues. Am I misunderstanding what an outline entails? Is the outline the same as doing a case summary?

Should we contact Professor Danay for clarification?

Thank you,

Jennifer