Getting started!

Good question Sydney. I understand that participation in the discussions was mandatory for a mark on the project, but don’t recall reading anywhere that it was mandatory that we had to complete the questionnaire.

Unless we can find written proof of that point perhaps we can assume those of us who completed it acted on our own motives, a perceived expectation or sense of duty or curiosity. To echo Sydney's question: does anyone know if completion of the questionnaire was mandatory?

Cheers Kevin

KevinRose (talk)18:39, 28 July 2013

Is everyone okay if I reduce the abstract down to the normal length and add our results into it.

AmyPrangnell (talk)02:15, 1 August 2013

Yes, keeping it short is a good idea and the results definitely need to be added.

JaimieVeale (talk)18:19, 1 August 2013

So I greatly reduced it down and added the main results, I can add some for discussion once those pages finish up. I removed parts that were discussed in other sections to keep it shorter. Also, I was reading through the other sections and they seem to mention masculinity and femininity, as opposed to male-like and female-like so I was wondering if we could remove that sentence and use masculine and feminine for the report. Feel free to edit as this is a rough draft before the whole report finishes up.

AmyPrangnell (talk)02:29, 2 August 2013

Yes this looks great Amy and I am happy to lose the “male-like, female-like” descriptors; though Lippa promotes these terms for their neutrality they nonetheless sound a bit clunky. And thanks for adding results; this section is looking sharper. Please go ahead and edit as needed!

KevinRose (talk)15:12, 2 August 2013