frorum for week of 31 October: error, ignorance, use
Fragment of a discussion from Course talk:PHIL240/2011WT1-section2
Actually none of those seem particularly appealing. Part of the problem is maybe the way "being" is used here: as if a person had to devote their life entirely to this or that with no competing interests...
If I were forced to choose though, I suppose I'd go with being the technologist. Although the description gives the profession a sort of (in my view) superficial aim: making life "easier and more fun," it seems the best choice to combine the two desirables--knowledge and utility.