Group 3: Case 1, Week 2

I see a few errors here and there in terms of grammar so I'll go through the Wiki and nitpick those I guess.

Also the references are only in whatever format they were given in. Should we just stick to one citation method and fix the references? I don't think we'll get a reply on which citation method to use in time...

I think it would be best to just have them in one format, it's not like it *really* matters which method we use tbh as long as we properly reference everything.

I already checked the three sections posted on wiki for grammar and content.

For the reference, I agree with Riaaz and I also think it should be in alphabetical order.

So we're just waiting for Kevin to finish the references for his entry section right before we can rearrange the reference lists?

The Wiki automatically sorts references in the order that it's cited and I already put it in Wiki format. If you do it by alpha order it won't link to the internal link within the entry.

okay that's fine. by the way, how come the figures for the entry are missing. I don't know how to put those figures on wiki. some help?

Ok I double check everything too and made some edits. Great job guys!

I just realized how molecular Kevin's part is haha but I think it should be good!

I never got a reply from Dr. Kelly so I think this style of reference is okay.

Also I wonder how they're going to mark this? because my section was added onto the wiki by someone else (i.e. she wont see what I did cause I wasn't the one logged on to post it into here)...so maybe we should have her know about our google documents haha. Unless she monitors this discussion as well!

Also can someone resize the pics? Or does noone else thinks that they're super huge?

We get a mark for our entire entry as a group, then we have some peer assessment thing. Also trying to figure out resizing. Might not be able to do it without downloading and then uploading (copyright issues).

hmm yeah thats such a hassle to resize...well it still kind of works haha. Anyways I think we're done? All looks good guys!

guys, I just found out that we actually got our mark back for week 1 (under internal message) so I think we're supposed to improve on the contents with the comments from prof.

so you guys might want to check that too to see if we need to change anything here for week 2.

Yeah she sent us that message in the beginning of this week. I combined our answers together, read some of your guys sources, and added some extra research, so it should be okay?.

If there is anything that I combined from your section that was suggested to be corrected, please do so!

Do we need to be posting anything in the journal thing this week? ._.

The journal thing is optional I believe. We use it for this week (3rd week of the case) to write down stuff we've learned from ours and the others group's wiki. We use the journal as our study guide/notes for studying for the final