Critique

Interesting topic, found it well structured and concise, although it has quite a few grammatical errors, which make it hard to comprehend. I'd have liked to see some more context to understand its qualities and pitfalls. Good job otherwise, I like the GIF in the page!

The topic is relevant for the course. 4 The writing is clear and the English is good. 2 The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5 The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5 The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5 There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 2 There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 4 It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 4 It is correct. 5 It was too short for the topic (i.e., 1 means too long, 3 means about right) 4 It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5 It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5 The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 4 I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4 This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 3 If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 17