Peer Feedback

Page is nicely structured and I love how concise it is and to the point. The diagram really helps with understanding. I feel like at times, repeating what you are about to discuss especially on shorter sections may be repeating the same idea over and over again. But overall, very nice informative fundamental page. Overall, I'd rate it 18/20.

(5) The topic is relevant for the course.

(5) The writing is clear and the English is good.

(5) The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).

(5) The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.

(5) The abstract is a concise and clear summary.

(4) There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.

(N/A) There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code.

(5) It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic).

(5) It is correct.

(5) It was neither too short nor too long for the topic.

(5) It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page).

(5) It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki.

(5) The references and links to external pages are well chosen.

(5) I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.

(4) This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.