Peer Feedback

Your page is well structured and the concepts presented are well introduced. I'd rephrase some parts of the introduction to make it easier to read. for example "This paper will give a short overview of continual learning and the different approaches used in literature to achieve it. The paper will then explore one of these methods, progressive neural networks." maybe something of this kind: "This paper will provide a short overview of continual learning and the different approaches used, diving more into detail in the progressive neural networks method." It seems as if you are yet to finish your page. I'd like to maybe have some examples of applications of the algorithm or where it is been used. I liked your graph, it was very relevant and helpful to my comprehension.

(5) The topic is relevant for the course.

(4) The writing is clear and the English is good.

(5) The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).

(4) The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.

(5) The abstract is a concise and clear summary.

(-) There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.

(-) There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code.

(4) It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic).

(5) It is correct.

(5) It was neither too short nor too long for the topic.

(5) It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page).

(5) It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki.

(5) The references and links to external pages are well chosen.

(5) I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.

(4) This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.