November Assignment feedback

I thought the descriptions incorporated in your page were good but I didn't quite understand your solution for incorporating patient preferences in a decision-support system. I found your paragraphs on calibrating low probability outcomes that patients may encounter with familiar gambles quite interesting and can see how this could be beneficial to patients. However, I didn't understand how it related to your solution and utility assessments. Perhaps adding a couple more sentences or paragraphs on your specific solution and relating the utility assessments to the familiar gambles paragraph could help.

I appreciate the thorough descriptions on your page, particularly the insights into calibrating low probability outcomes with familiar gambles, which I found intriguing. However, the connection between this concept and your proposed solution for incorporating patient preferences in a decision-support system could be clearer. Adding a few sentences to bridge the gap between the familiar gambles paragraph and your solution would enhance overall coherence. Furthermore, the page's abstract nature could be addressed by incorporating a concrete example, illustrating how the proposed technique can be practically applied and extended for future decisions. Clarifying whether your proposal is for one-off decisions or long-term elicitation would provide valuable context; an example could effectively illustrate this distinction. These enhancements would strengthen your proposal and facilitate a clearer understanding for the reader.