Critique

• The writing is clear and the English is good: 5

 * The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds): 4
 * The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand: 5
 * The abstract is a concise and clear summary: 5
 * There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear: 5
 * There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code:  3 (Although there wasn't pseudocode, given what you covered it wasn't really needed. Could be helpful if the page is expanded though.)
 * It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic): 5
 * It is correct: 5
 * It was neither too short nor too long for the topic: 3 ( you may want to complete the incomplete parts) 
 * It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page):  5 
 * It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki: 2
 * The references and links to external pages are well chosen: 5
 * I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic: 4
 * This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate: 4

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 16