critique

As far as I know, negation is nowhere close to being a solved problem, so no worries there as long as it's acknowledged in the page.

As far as the position of the hypothesis in the page, it might be wise to wait for the other critiques as well, as that's more a stylistic decision than one with a correct/incorrect answer.

I think David really wants our hypotheses to be as precise as possible, so he's going to want to see "better than random" somewhere in your hypothesis section.

Thanks for the quick reply!

JordonJohnson (talk)22:07, 18 April 2016

Thanks a lot for the constructive suggestions! I will modify the hypothesis to make it more specific.

SamprityKashyap (talk)22:17, 18 April 2016