Critique

Hi Wenyi. I find your content interesting. There are a few notes on it. you may want to expand you abstract by giving more details on the discussions you will have. It seems a bit short to me. Although it is a theoretical page, adding some images can be done in some cases. It would also be nice to talk about the future works.

• The topic is relevant for the course. 5
• The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
• The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5
• The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5
• The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 3 (you can give more details on what you are going to talk about and what will be the discussions)
• There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 4
• There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 4 (maybe it wasn't needed)
• It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
• It is correct. 5
• It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 3 (it could be a bit shorter on the paper review and then added your point of view in more details)
• It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
• It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5
• The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 5
• I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4
• This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 5

I would give it 17 in total.