Peer Reviews

I clearly remember commenting on your page in here on March 20, but I don't know why it does not exist right now! I had mentioned that you had not written your thoughts on the incremental contribution of the papers, which I see you have added that since March 20. I had also mentioned that I understand how the second paper is related to the first paper, but the text in the conclusion section leads the readers to feel like the two papers are only related in solving the same problem. Best, Ali

AliMohammadMehr (talk)‎

Hi Ali, thank you for checking back and leaving the feedback.

> the text in the conclusion section leads the readers to feel like the two papers are only related in solving the same problem.

RBM at the time of publication was (I believe) a de novo approach to collaborative filtering, so RBM and SVD methodologically are not very closely related. I'll add some details to avoid confusion.

NamHeeKim (talk)‎