Suggestions for Particle Filtering

Suggestions for Particle Filtering

Hello Arthur,

First, let me thank you for contributing to this Wiki. There are a lot of bright points on your page, and I like most of the parts and their content, but there are a few points that came to my mind that I want to suggest you. 1) You might wanna add a "More General Than" part in your page, I believe it is part of the template that Dr. Poole suggested and personally I think it is a useful thing to have on a wiki page. 2) In your "Prerequisite II" part, there is a hyperlink in a wrong format "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_Carlo_method" 3) The page lacks links to other wiki pages 4) In the "Mathematical Model" there is an uploaded file in a wrong format: File:Mathematical Formula 5.png 5) There is no Bibliography section. It is worth mentioning that in academic world, the bibliography part gives credit to an article, and when it lacks, decreases the validity of the article. 6) It might be good to include the "To Add" section at the end so the next contributors can understand which areas are good to work and develop 7) I believe it is better if you put the links and authors at the bibliography section rather than putting some PDFs in your content

These were the points that came to my mind while reading your page.

Mehrdad Ghomi

MehrdadGhomi (talk)06:49, 5 February 2016

Hello Mehrdad Ghomi,

Nice to here from you about your points about my wiki page 1) You might wanna add a "More General Than" part in your page, I believe it is part of the template that Dr. Poole suggested and personally I think it is a useful thing to have on a wiki page. -- Overview tab already added in the abstract part. 2) In your "Prerequisite II" part, there is a hyperlink in a wrong format "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_Carlo_method" -- Changed already 3) The page lacks links to other wiki pages --added in the Related Wiki Page Session --added already 4) In the "Mathematical Model" there is an uploaded file in a wrong format: File:Mathematical Formula 5.png --changed already 5) There is no Bibliography section. It is worth mentioning that in academic world, the bibliography part gives credit to an article, and when it lacks, decreases the validity of the article. --added already 6) It might be good to include the "To Add" section at the end so the next contributors can understand which areas are good to work and develop --added already. 7) I believe it is better if you put the links and authors at the bibliography section rather than putting some PDFs in your content -- I will change that.

Thank you very much

BaoSun (talk)04:17, 10 February 2016