Feedback

• (5) The topic is relevant for the course.
• (4) The writing is clear and the English is good.
• (4) The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).
• (4) The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.
• (4) The abstract is a concise and clear summary.
• (4.5) There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.
• (3) There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code.
• (5) It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic).
• (5) It is correct.
• (4) It was neither too short nor too long for the topic.
• (4) It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page).
• (3) It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki.
• (5) The references and links to external pages are well chosen.
• (4) I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.
• (3) This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.