Initial Comments

Overall this is great! Well done!

Sometime later in the term, we should have a discussion on:

• the "magic" of GCN which just means that it provides a strong bias/prior that may or may not correspond with what is desired (the example you give is a property of aggregation used)
• the appropriateness of paths (paths provide limited representation power, e.g., the graphs formed by reification are not defined by paths, but by more structured graphs)
• the assumption that commonsense is captured by finding the most likely answer in multiple choice questions. (Children learn commonsense by playing and interacting in the world.)

Thank you for this comment, Prof. David. I agree with these points and I would love to have a discussion on the following points and/or probably focus my second page (March) on these key points as well! Cheers, Mehar Bhatia