Suggestions

Hi Adnan,

I enjoy reading your page.

Here are a few suggestions:

>Related Literature

It is better to cite the related literatures.

>It might be better not to put texts and formulas in figures. If you explain texts of the figure by yourself, even without the formulas, it will be more understandable for people of different research areas.

You may want to add figure 2 after starting to explain about that.

I know that cross validation works better than splitting the data-set to train and test sets. But I think cross validation is used for selecting parameters and after specifying the parameters, the model with the defined parameters will be built based on the large amount of data. Why have you used cross validation and have you tried to build the model based on the whole data (or large amount of data)?

Thank you Bahare for pointing out these issues. I have gone through the page and added citations where it was missing. I have also included a brief explanation of figure 2 before adding it. One of primary authors of the working paper on which this page is based recommended using cross validation since it would generalize better to new data.