critique

There are some spaces missing in the formatting of the brackets in the Introduction section. Why are the rewards for wrong pickup/drop off so small? Is that a consideration at all? Overall, it might be useful to outline more clearly the limitations of the study and some future directions and I think you have space for it as the page is not that long. I think it might be useful to report some specific numbers/comparisons in the results so it does not need to be read off the graph.

Other than that this page was well-organized and nice to read!

The topic is relevant for the course. 5 The writing is clear and the English is good. 5 The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students. 5 The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5 The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5 There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.5 There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 5 It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning. 5 It is correct. 5 It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 4 It was an appropriate unit for a page. 5 It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5 The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 5 I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.5 This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 5 If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 19