Critique 3
The page looks good! It has a good coverage and the explanations are thorough. I didn't actually find anything to critique except the fact that the page is incomplete and you can talk more about the results of the things you tried. Maybe talking a little more about frameworks/implementation details or challenges would be useful.
Marking scheme:
* The topic is relevant for the course. 5 * The writing is clear and the English is good. 5 * The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5 * The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 4 * The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 4 * There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 4 * There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. N/A * It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 3 * It is correct. 5 * It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 5 * It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5 * It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 2 * The references and links to external pages are well chosen. N/A * I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4 * This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4 If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 18