Critique

On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:

The topic is relevant for the course. 5
The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5
The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5
The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 4
There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 3
There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 0
It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
It is correct. 5
It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 3
It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 0
The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 0
I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4
This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 17