Critique

On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:

  • The topic is relevant for the course. 5
  • The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
  • The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5
  • The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5
  • The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 4
  • There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 3
  • There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 0
  • It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
  • It is correct. 5
  • It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 3
  • It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
  • It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 0
  • The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 0
  • I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4
  • This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 17

  • A good page with good graphics and explanations.
  • Note: This page seems incomplete.
  • Will you have a hypothesis? I believe it's part of the criteria.
  • Perhaps you can include a description of your results and images.
  • References?
MayYoung (talk)02:12, 19 April 2018