Critique

* The topic is relevant for the course: 5
   * The writing is clear and the English is good: 5
   * The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds): 4 (more mathematical machine learning and tables can be added)
   * The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand: 5
   * The abstract is a concise and clear summary: 5
   * There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear: 5
   * There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code:  3 (Although there wasn't pseudocode, given what you covered it wasn't really needed. Could be helpful if the page is expanded though.)
   * It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic): 4
   * It is correct: 5
   * It was neither too short nor too long for the topic: 3
   * It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page):  4 (This page could probably be split up a bit into a few different pages, 
     each of the representative methods just be their own page. Although I do think the page works as a broad intro on its own as well.)
   * It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki: 5
   * The references and links to external pages are well chosen: 5
   * I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic: 4
   * This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate: 4
      

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 17 :D