Critiques

Hi Tanuj Kr Aasawat,


Nice draft, however, from my perspective, you can improve the effectiveness of this page:

1. By providing a little background on the available literatures; providing a kind of indication of how the literature space is organized in order to let readers get a better idea of the available gaps and the area that these two papers fitted in.
2. As it has been already mentioned, it would be much better if you make a better transition between two papers; better elaborate the connection of two
3. “Result” doesn’t represent what you wrote in that section (paper 1), I believe it should be “Discussion” or “Discussion and Conclusion”, you are not necessarily obligated to have a result section as this is a summary and the overall outcomes are much important than specific ones.
4. The training models and the equation of leaf node evaluation (paper 2) would appreciate some Math tags

All above matters aside, it was a good draft and I enjoyed reading it.

Good job,

Yaashaar

Thanks Yaashaar. I'll incorporate your suggestions.