Critique 2

Jump to: navigation, search

Hi,

Comments[wikitext]

I've noticed one other grammatical mistake:

'needs' in "decision trees even though need small historical data but needs it to be complete and correct".

I also recommend using bigger figures for the page.

Scheme[wikitext]

  • The topic is relevant for the course. 5
  • The writing is clear and the English is good. 4
  • The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5
  • The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 4
  • The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 4
  • There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 5
  • There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 4
  • It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 4
  • It is correct. 5
  • It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 4
  • It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
  • It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5
  • The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 5
  • I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 5
  • This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4
  • If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 17
07:44, 7 February 2018

Hi, Thanks AINAZHAJIMORADLOU for providing the feedback. I have corrected the grammatical error and also increased the size of the images.

Best, Ekta Aggarwal

18:44, 7 February 2018