peer feedback

In reading the page from the top in order, it is not clear to me if the Personal agents use the content-based filtering? Overall this was a really interesting page to read. I would like to hear more background on the actual Bots and how these were thought up and why these specific ones were chosen. Also it was a little bit inconsistent with the usage of personal agent = content-filtering = information filtering. I would also suggest to include more details about the first paper and their results - to have more specifics on what exactly the newer paper added and how these agents differ. Also it would be great to hear about other possible extensions to these models and maybe even your own opinion about the works. 18/20

(5) The topic is relevant for the course.

(5) The writing is clear and the English is good.

(5) The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).

(5) The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.

(4) The abstract is a concise and clear summary.

(5) There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.

(5) There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code.

(5) It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic).

(5) It is correct.

(4) It was neither too short nor too long for the topic.

(5) It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page).

(5) It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki.

(5) The references and links to external pages are well chosen.

(5) I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.

(4) This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.