Feedback

Hi Wenyi,

The topic of your Wiki page is interesting and new to me, so I can't comment on the technical stuff, but I sure have some comments from the perspective of a newbie. Below are some comments about your article:

• In many places |I see the use of the word "we", but I see that only you have authored this page. So, if you had some help it would be better to mention, else the Wiki page should be altered in such manner that it reflects that only you have worked on this page.
• There is not much information given in this article about the RSI or the background of the problem or the technique, which could essentially help the reader gain some context. If you had the January or February assignment which was about the baseline of the RSI, it would be helpful to give its link at the beginning of the document.
• Some grammatical errors were also there, I suggest the use of Grammarly tool. This tool is great, I use it for myself as well.
• In Introduction section, in line "Chalmers' proportionality thesis [8] hypothesizes", the reference number "8" is given, but in the bibliography, there is no item.

Thanks, Ekta Aggarwal