Critique

Interesting topic choice. It seems clear that you intend to add a little more to your page, so I look forward to reading the finished version! There are a few spots where you might need to edit a little bit and fix some typos/grammar etc. For instance, the title of the page should definitely have the typo fixed. Overall though this is a goood start.

   The topic is relevant for the course. 5
   The writing is clear and the English is good. 3 (Some typos/grammar issues)
   The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5
   The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 4
   The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5
   There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. N/A (It would help to add some examples)
   There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. N/A
   It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 4
   It is correct. 5 
   It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 4 (It's a little short, but it seems obvious you intend to add to it)
   It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
   It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. N/A
   The references and links to external pages are well chosen. N/A
   I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 3 (Hard to judge yet, would need to see the finished version)
   This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 3 (Hard to judge yet because as mentioned before, it seems obvious you intend to add to it and I'd need to see the final version)

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 16