Critique

• The topic is relevant for the course. 5
• The writing is clear and the English is good. 3
• The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5
• The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5
• The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5
• There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 3
• There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 3
• It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
• It is correct. 5
• It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 5
• It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
• It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5
• The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 4
• I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4
• This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 3
• If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 15

Comments:
The title has a spelling error in it, Baseilne of RSI should be Basline of RSI. The link in the related pages "intelligence explosion" has an invalid character causing it to break. Many minor gramatical issues, for example "by formulate a class" should be "by formulating a class", easy fixes though. It is an interesting topic but I'm still a bit confused how it works. For example, in the experimental results, what did the programs that you improved actually do? You say you test in sumulation with randomly generated abstraction of programs, can you give an example of one of them? Also, you may want at least once source in the bibliography, or maybe remove it if it will be left blank.