critique

Interesting topic! I was not aware of these technologies. I found the article quite wordy for the information being presented, I'd recommend writing shorter sentences to make it more readable. I also drew little information from the 2nd and 3rd figures. Maybe adding some result graphics could be more informative.

out of 5 The topic is relevant for the course. 3.5 The writing is clear and the English is good. 5 The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5 The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5 The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 2 There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 4 There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. - It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 2 It is correct. 5 It was too short for the topic (i.e., 1 means too long, 3 means about right) 2 It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5 It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5 The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 5 I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 3.5 This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 3 If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 17