Critique
Hi guys,
Overal, it's a thorough survey on different methods of filtering. I have some comments that may be useful to you though:
1. There are some grammatical errors/typos such as "based off", "Be base our implementation based off the description of both methods", etc.
2. You might want to write references in [1] format instead of superscript in the original context. (e.g. in [1], they focus on ...)
3. It would be nice to have some quantitative results as well as qualitative results like using tables to report accuracy on some subset of dataset for all proposed algorithms and comparing them.
Marking scheme:
* The topic is relevant for the course. 5 * The writing is clear and the English is good. 4 * The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5 * The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 4 * The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 4 * There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 4 * There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 3 * It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). N/A * It is correct. 5 * It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 5 * It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5 * It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 3 * The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 4 * I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4 * This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4 If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 17