Critique

Overall the page is well written and the topic is very interesting. The abstract is quite long; this version could be used as introduction (since it’s missing) in the Content section, and a shorter version should be used as Abstract. The page is also missing the short one-sentence summary that helps the reader grasp the topic. The theoretic background for the topic is quite advanced and I think it’s not a base knowledge for CPSC 522 students. For this reason I think the page would benefit from either a bit more explanation on core topics or proper references for these.

The topic is relevant for the course. 5 The writing is clear and the English is good. 4 The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 4 The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 4 The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 3 There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 4 There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code-. It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5 It is correct. 5 It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 5 It was an appropriate unit for a page. 5 It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5 The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 5 I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 5 This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4 If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 17.5