Critique 3
This was very well written which made an already intriguing topic even more exciting. My only concerns are: 1) there are some grammatical mistakes; 2) The treatment of some of the approaches and projects is very informal - perhaps give a taste of the specific implementation or formal theory behind some of the ideas in one or two of the examples?
On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:
- The topic is relevant for the course.
- The writing is clear and the English is good. 3
- The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 3
- The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5
- The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5
- There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 5
- There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 5
- It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
- It is correct. 5
- It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 5
- It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
- It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5
- The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 5
- I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 5
- This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4
If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 19