Critique

If I were to mark right now: On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:

The topic is relevant for the course. 5

The writing is clear and the English is good. 3.5

The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 4.5

The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. N/A

The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5

There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 3 (examples, but didn't help very much)

There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. N/A

It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 4

It is correct. 5

It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 4 (could have been longer)

It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5

It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 4 (could have had more links)

The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 4 (as above)

I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 3

This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 3

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 16

Suggestions:

• spelling & grammar check
• use appropriate links to concepts that are not general knowledge
• use proper math font for variables