Structure

Hi Everyone,

Thank you for all your wonderful comments! I have added more content, though I have taken down my references for the moment until I have finished writing all my content. To answer your question Jessica, I will be only looking at Canada at the United States. I will be sure to add links to all the legislation I listed. Do you think it would be easier if I listed all my comments about how each of the individual laws affects archives, under the section "Effects of Privacy Legislation on Archives" or would it be better suited under each of the relevant laws? I have also changed the title of the page so that it is easier to find. Also, does anyone know how to delineate the sections so that it lists as 1.1a, 1.1.b....ect.?

CathrynCrocker (talk)05:17, 4 April 2015

The choice of heading you use (ie how many equals signs you put around your heading) is what does the headings. I don't know it there is a way to make the sections lettered instead of numbered. You have them tiered now, which is great! Although looking at the list, I'm sort of wondering about my suggestion to break things up into Federal and Provincial. Maybe you should try just bolding the name of the legislation instead of making them sub-sub-headings so that your provincial list isn't a mile long and see how that looks in your table of contents?

Re: Effects of Privacy on Archives, I think it depends on how much you have to say about the laws and the effect they have. Would a third sub-heading (2.3) under Privacy Legislation be appropriate, maybe? That way it's linked directly to Privacy, but you've got your solid idea grouped together and not broken up into snippets.

AllisonMills (talk)09:22, 4 April 2015