feedback

The content is good, I can follow along pretty well with what corporate archives are and their mission. The main issues are primarily grammatical, such as; “Corporate archives are typically regarded are the archives that are”. I believe you meant “regarded as”. So just some small issues like this that I am sure will be fixed upon your further revisions. Regarding references, I am pretty sure we are supposed to use the footnote styled referencing for the wiki. I would take a look at some other developed page codes and then tag the specific places to connect the reader more easily between sources and content. If you can’t find the right coding let me know and I will get it to you. Otherwise, great work so far and look forward to its further development.

Thanks for the response!

The way the footnotes are now are mostly the result of a time crunch. I know that's something that needs to be changed. I'll see if I can get them up with the next update, but we shall see. I'll look out for grammatical errors as well and see what I can do to correct them.