Some comments
Fragment of a discussion from Course talk:ARST573/BC Archives
Sorry for being really late to reply to you again! I see you have added some more info to the holdings sections - hopefully you didn't have to do too much more work finding more information, but now it sounds really good. One super time grammar point I happened to notice: Under you Document Disposal Act, I think if you added a "was" before "designed for a paper-based recordkeeping system" in the first sentence it would read a bit better. Other than that your whole page still looks excellent!