Feedback

Hello Rosie,

I'm still going through grammatical edits, though the comment of support is great.

I get what you mean by my list being overwhelming. Again, I'm not sure how much that will reduce my footnotes. I really wanted to make it columned and a smaller font, but I can't figure that out at the moment.

I will consider the Archival Institutions section further. So long as I can include that line about overlap somehow I think it could work.

Thanks!

P.S. Yes, I realize that my page is separated from theirs due to the dash. Do you think it's worth it renaming the page? I can do it pretty easily.

MargaretHunter (talk)18:47, 9 April 2015

The Archival institution stuff is totally up to you. That's probably just me being nitpicky, anyway.

As for renaming, it's up to you. It's a minor thing, and only worth it if you think it is. Besides, I'm not sure how much it matters in the long run, ya know?

Seriously, your page is great.

Rosie Bigelow (talk)18:51, 9 April 2015
 

Maggie is trying to break away from the rest of us history people with her special dash...

Also, I too battled with the columned footnotes and even though I had the correct code and everything, it wouldn't work. Maybe its a UBC thing?

MorganClendenning (talk)18:57, 9 April 2015

It may be a UBC wiki thing. They don't have anything about customized footnotes on their help pages. Though i find it odd that it wouldn't accept code from "regular" Wiki.

MargaretHunter (talk)19:06, 9 April 2015