Jump to content

Science:Math Exam Resources/Courses/MATH110/April 2016/Question 03 (c)/Solution 1

From UBC Wiki

Before we apply intermediate value theorem, let’s discuss why the intersection can only happen in (0,1) rather than (−∞,0]∪[1,∞).

We know from the question that f(x)=ex when x≤0. Since the exponential function ex is an increasing function, we have f(x)≤f(0)=e0=1 when x≤0. On the other hand, e−x is decreasing, and hence so is e−(x−1)=e⋅e−x. This follows that e−(x−1)≥e1=e when x≤0. This implies that for x≤0, we have

f(x)≤1<e≤e⋅e−x.

(Note that e∼2.7>1.) In other words, f(x)≠e−x for any point in (−∞,0].

In a similar manner, we can show that when x≥1, we have that f(x)=x2+1≥12+1=2 but  e−(x−1)≤e−(1−1)=1 i.e., f(x)>e−(x−1) on x∈[1,∞)

The above analysis would be more obvious if you draw the graphs of f and g.


Now, we find the value k which makes f(x)−e−(x−1)=0 have at least one solution on the interval (0,1), by using the intermediate value theorem.

On the interval (0,1), let F(x)=f(x)−e−(x−1)=k(x−1)+2−e−(x−1).

(Here, we use f(x)=k(x−1)+2 on (0,1).)

It is time to apply intermediate value theorem, note that F(x) is continuous in the interval (0,1), and

F(0)=−k+2−e, F(1)=0+2−1=1.

To make F have at least a zero in (0,1), by the theorem, we need to make sure that F(0) and F(1) have opposite signs. i.e., F(0)⋅F(1)=(−k+2−e)⋅1<0.

Solving this inequality gives us that k>2−e.

Thus, we have at least one solution to F(x)=0 (i.e., f(x)=g(x)=e−(x−1)) if k>2−e.