MET:Assessment tools in a 21st Century classroom
Created by Chris Irvine and Kara Crowley (Winter 2013)
Assessment Tools in the 21st Century
A knowledge based society, or "21st century society", is one in which its members, through Lifelong learning, share innovations and expertise within a community of experts and non-experts, in the spirit of apprenticeship. This results in a network of knowledge which is created, shared, used and protected by the network itself. Knowledge is used to inform and improve ourselves and others both culturally and materially, with the goal of building a sustainable society.  21st Century Learning skills are skills necessary in a knowledge-based society, such as information and communication skills (including information processing and research tools),thinking and problem solving skills (including using technological tools such as spreadsheets to solve problems and think creatively) and interpersonal and self-directional skills (such as e-learning and collaboration).  Educational assessment, according to the British Columbia Ministry of Education, is the "process of gathering evidence of what a student knows, understands, is able to do and is working towards."  In a knowledge-based society, with its network of both technology and people, current assessment tools require upgrading to ensure that learners are prepared for a rapidly changing and ever-connected community, society and world. It is important to understand the culturally significant values that are currently driving the need for knowledge and to consider the direction of the greater society before generating tools to measure the progress of learners in that society. In order to do that we must consider the needs of a 21st century learner in a knowledge-based society.
Needs of a knowledge-based society
- Numeracy skills: how to apply mathematical concepts to problem solving and everyday life.
- Literacy skills: functional literacy: able to learn from what they read
- Critical thinking skills: search skills to access information, critical thinking skills to analyze and evaluate info and problem solving skills to utilize information.
- Creativity and Innovation: able to generate ideas, see things in a different way from others, to approach new learning from different direction
- Technological literacy: able to use technology to enhance learning and increase productivity.
- Communications Literacy: being able to relate ideas to others in person, on paper, or with technology.
- Media Literacy: using media to access, assess and analyze information and use new media forms to communicate.
- Collaboration and teamwork: knowledge based societies are interactive and require multiple people working in diverse ways to be innovative.
- Personal organization: personal possessions, organizational materials, time management
- Motivation, Self-Regulation and Adaptability: Being able to set and accomplish goals, when and how to apply effort, making decisions, prioritizing choices, making responsible decisions to enable independence and skill transfer to many occupations.
- Ethics, Civic Responsibility, Cross-cultural awareness: treating others, our environment and our society respectfully and obeying laws are essential to a fully functioning society.
Current assessment tools
In schools, teachers generate criteria based on learning outcomes for the subject and grade and on expected levels of performance. In the early years, performance scales and written reports outline progress in relation to expected development of students in similar age ranges. In grades 4-12, letter grades indicate performance in relation to learning outcomes. Teachers may use performance standards which describe expected levels of achievement in reading, writing, numeracy and social responsibility.Assessment methods and tools recommended up until the present have included observation, student self-assessments, daily practice assignments, quizzes, samples of student work, pencil-and-paper tests, holistic rating scales, projects, oral and written reports, reviews of performance and portfolios. Evaluation is based on criteria which is based on learning outcomes. Norm-referenced evaluation (basic skills tests, diagnostic tests) is also permitted to be used for large-scale system assessments.
Goals of 21st century assessments
Today's students need to collaborate with educators and make use of technology to get immediate feedback in order to improve outcomes. Technology allows educators to assess a student’s progress far more regularly than is possible with traditional classroom assessments and to identify and address each student’s challenges as they arise. This is in contrast to a system where assessment through tests and exams measures what a student learned at the end of an instructional unit, by which time it is often too late to address shortcomings. Having said that, measurement and assessment must not only be a tool to help the student learn but also to measure achievement for those outside the system, be it post-secondary education institutions or potential employers. However, what gets measured will impact upon both teaching and learning. Some of the skills discussed earlier are difficult to measure so it is important that a balance be struck that ensures a student’s progress is properly measured and yet does not stifle, or discourage some of the creativity and courage we are trying to engender in our students. The climate of assessment moves from exams and toward smaller more regular assessments. Data accessible to learners informs progress, with standards acting as anchors to learning. Rather than focusing on product based evaluations, performance and self knowledge are refined over time. Students are assessed before and during learning so that feedback may be provided that can be used to improve work and deepen understanding. In addition to quizzes, tests and worksheets, conferences, notes, self-reflection, journals and rubrics and checklists are used. Students are encouraged to assess themselves and their peers to enhance engagement and awareness of their own learning. Assessment is part of the learning process so that teachers and students are working together to monitor progress. 
Assessment for, as, and of learning
There are three distinct but inter-related purposes for classroom assessment: assessment for learning, assessment as learning, and assessment of learning.
Assessment for Learning
In assessment for learning, teachers use assessment as a research tool to find out as much as they can about what their students know and are able to do, as well what presumptions and misunderstandings they may have. Teachers also use assessment for learning to boost student's motivation and commitment to learning. . Examples of 21st century assessment for learning tools, which include both diagnostic tests and formative assessments, are eportfolios, teacher observations, class discussions, and works in progress with comments, think-pair-share, journals, observation checklists, concept maps, and rubrics.
Assessment as Learning
Assessment as learning focusses on students and emphasizes assessment as a process of metacognition. Assessment as learning comes from the constructivist idea that learning is an active process that occurs when students interact with new ideas. It is based on research about how learning occurs and is characterized by students reflecting on their own learning and making adaptations, adjustments, and changes to their thinking. . Examples of 21st Century assessment as learning tools include self-assessments, peer assessments, student-teacher conferences, teacher observations with feedback and interim product analysis. 
Assessment of Learning
Assessment of learning refers to strategies intended to corroborate what students know, show whether or not they have met curriculum outcomes or the goals of their individualized programs, or to confirm ability and make decisions about student's future programs or placements. It is intended to show evidence of achievement to other educators, parents, students themselves, and sometimes outside groups (e.g., educational institutions). . Examples of 21st Century Assessment of Learning tools are eportfolios, with "best piece" samples to show progress, open-ended response questions, descriptions of observations in Science experiments, historical role-playing arguments about the impact of decisions on current life, the writing process applied to poetry, long-term projects and problem-based reports. 
Current or traditional assessment practices are teacher focused, done with tests, quizzes and worksheets, completed outside of the learning and teaching activities and are done at the end of the learning activity for grading purposes.  Most of these tools would be considered as Assessment "of" learning. 21st Century assessment tools will emphasize assessment "as" and assessment "for" learning tools.
Assessment directions in B.C.
According to the Curriculum and Assessment Framework Advisory Group of British Columbia, formed in November 2011, all assessment activities should support ongoing learning and focus on five cross-curricular learning competencies (communication, critical thinking, creative thinking and innovation, personal responsibility and well-being and social responsibility) along with learning standards for the age and subject (under development). Assessment materials should allow multiple ways to both assess and show learning, with opportunities for student self-assessment and assessment for learning. The group suggested developmental continua be developed for cross-curricular competencies, with performance standards in use changing to match the change in focus.
- There should be provincial assessments at the elementary and secondary levels.
- Provincial assessments should be used to provide feedback for learning
- Provincial assessments should allow multiple formats, including performance tasks, inquiries and class-based assessments
- Literacy and numeracy should be stressed at the elementary level
- Competencies and key learning areas should be emphasized at the secondary level 
The language of "reporting" should be shifted to "communicating student learning" according to the advisory group. Teachers are encouraged to report at "key times of the year" (p.7) about cross-curricular competencies and key learning, using performance scales. Self-assessment is encouraged, as well as using diverse measures of performance, such as portfolios, work samples and other evidence.
Conversations are continuing in regional meetings at present to determine the appropriate use of letter grades, cross-curricular competencies, aboriginal perspectives on learning, curriculum and how to assess personalized learning.
The Question of Support for Educators
According to the British Columbia Teachers Federation,school districts and teacher education programs will need to provide systemic supports to educators if the transition to 21st century learning is to be successful. They include formative assessment for learning supports in a climate where large scale testing is not supported.
Apple (2008). “Apple classrooms of tomorrow—today. Learning in the 21st century”. Retrieved February 8, 2013 from http://ali.apple.com/acot2/global/files/ACOT2_Background.pdf
Intel (2010). Intel Teach Elements: Assessment in 21st century classrooms. Santa Clara, CA.:Intel. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2013 from http://www.intel.com/education/video/assess/content.htm
Open Colleges (2013). "Components of a 21st century classroom". Image retrieved from:http://www.opencolleges.edu.au/infographic/21st_century_classroom.html
Premier's Technology Council (2010).A vision for 21st century education. Victoria, B.C.:Author. Retrieved Feb.4, 2013 from http://www.gov.bc.ca/premier/attachments/PTC_vision%20for_education.pdf
Western and Northern Canadian Protocol for Collaboration in Education (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind. Retrieved Feb 17, 2013 from www.wncp.ca/media/40539/rethink.pdf
- ↑ Palinkas, József (2011). Knowledge-Based Society. Paper presented at the World Science Forum. Budapest, Hungary. Retrieved February 7, 2013, from http://www.sciforum.hu/previous-fora/2003/permanent-update/knowledge-based-society.html)
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Naylor, Charles (2011). 21st century learning—Widening the frame of focus and debate: A BCTF Research discussion paper. Vancouver, B.C.:Author. Retrieved Feb. 01 from http://www.bctf.ca/uploadedFiles/Public/Issues/21CL/21CL-DiscussionPaper.pdf
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 British Columbia Ministry of Education (1994). Assessment Handbook Series. Retrieved from B.C. Ministry of Education website: http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/classroom_assessment/abouthand.htm
- ↑ Intel(2010). Intel Teach Elements: Assessment in 21st century classrooms. Santa Clara, CA.:Intel. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2013 from http://www.intel.com/education/video/assess/content.htm))
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Western and Northern Canadian Protocol for Collaboration in Education in Education (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind. Retrieved from www.wncp.ca/media/40539/rethink.pdf Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "WNCP" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "WNCP" defined multiple times with different content
- ↑ Roberts, Clive (2011) 21st century learning - assessment for learning. Retrieved January 31, 2011 from http://digitallearningworld.com/tag/21st-century-pedagogy.
- ↑ HP (2001). 21st century learning and assessment. Tech & Learning. HP author.
- ↑ Intel (2010). Intel Teach Elements: Assessment in 21st century classrooms. Santa Clara, CA.:Intel. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2013 from http://www.intel.com/education/video/assess/content.htm)
- ↑ British Columbia Ministry of Education (2012). Enabling innovation: Transforming curriculum and assessment. Retrieved Feb. 7, 2013 from http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/irp/docs/ca_transformation.pdf