Documentation:FIB book/problems/Nij Whiplash

From UBC Wiki

A study was conducted to investigate the effect of seat-back stiffness on the risk of whiplash injuries in rear-end collisions [1] .The Hybrid III mid-sized male dummy was used to perform the tests.

Question 1

Researchers used the criteria to estimate the risk of injury which is calculated as follows:

Where and are axial force (tension or compression) and moment (flexion or extension), respectively, and and are their respective critical values.

Four types of neck injury criteria are (Figure 1):

: Tension-Flexion

: Tension-Extension

: Compression-Flexion

: Compression-Extension

Among four types of neck injury criteria, which one you find the best estimator for whiplash injuries? Why? (Hint: Think about the mechanism of whiplash injury and the fact that most whiplash injury protection devices such as headrests try to prevent the head from backward movement)

Figure 1- Different flavors of

Question 2

You are given the data for axial force and flexion-extension moment of neck load cells at “rigid” and “not rigid” (175 Nm/deg) recliner stiffnesses. Use this data to calculate the maximum value of the criterion from the previous question for two given recliner stiffnesses and explain the procedure. (You can use the page SES-5 of this file. This page is on the 7th page of the PDF)

Hint:

Positive moment represents flexion and positive force represents tension

Download the data here

Question 3

Compare the two recliners based on the calculated criterion.

References

  1. Kleinberger; Michael & Voo; Liming & Merkle; Andrew & Bevan; Matthew & Chang; Shin-Sung & McKoy; Felicia (May 2003). "HE ROLE OF SEATBACK AND HEAD RESTRAINT DESIGN PARAMETERS ON REAR IMPACT OCCUPANT DYNAMICS". In 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Nagoya, Japan.
  2. Eppinger, R., Kuppa, S., Saul, R., & Sun, E. (2000). Supplement: development of improved injury criteria for the assessment of advanced automotive restraint systems: II.