Course talk:PHYS341/2018/project/kalimba

From UBC Wiki

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Peer review018:13, 26 March 2018

Peer review

Edited by another user.
Last edit: 18:13, 26 March 2018

Physics Content: Pretty well done on the physics component of the article. However, maybe add a little more information — there’s a bit of a discrepancy between the amount of non-physics content in relation to the acoustic concepts you have on your page.

Clear Explanations: Everything's explained in depth and really well!

Structure and Length: I think your page would benefit from a couple changes in term of how your table of contents is structured, especially in the beginning sections. For example, perhaps moving part of the introduction to add a history section would make your wiki easier to follow. I also believe you are under the minimum word count at around 850 words, but seeing that the “two main types of Kalimba” section is not yet filled in, this should not be a big issue.

Writing Style: Try to stick to a more objective writing style you'd see on Wikipedia or on another wiki site, because the way your article is written kind of veers more into a persuasive writing style. There are some grammatical errors but that can be changed easily.

Diagrams and Photographs: I think you guys are pretty good for this part because it looks like you made the diagrams and took the photos yourselves, good job!

DanicaViolaRint (talk)00:21, 26 March 2018