Course talk:PHYS341/2018/project/Kwanggari (꽹과리)
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
Peer review | 0 | 16:31, 30 March 2018 |
Peer Review Due on March 26 | 0 | 18:19, 26 March 2018 |
Non-physics content: Detailed-information about kwanggari of different era, providing us with a clear development process.
Physics Content: Well done on the physics component of the article. However, maybe add a little more information - for example - some theory related to the reason why kwanggari is a non-harmonic instrument.
Clear Explanations: Most of the content explained in depth and really well!
Structure and Length: It's hard to point out any deficiency of the structure, the length of the project is arranged pretty well~~
Diagrams and Photographs: I think you guys are good for this part by adding motion graph to make the content more vivid, but actually I think the last two diagrams are more related to Chinese luo, rather than kwanggari, so how about add some spectrum of kwanggari to your project?
Good job!
Comments:
- Physics content & explanations: Overall, your explanation is easy to understand.
I was wondering if the surface affect how Kwanggari sound? (you mentioned that its surface is not smooth). Also, it's great that you provide many details regarding the history of the music instrument & Korean tradition Pungmul. However, you can add more details about the different categories of Kwanggari [why male/female sound differently] I'm not exactly sure the differences between male / female kwanggari. [why male kwanggari has higher/sharper tone?]
- Writing style: Pretty explanatory, and it's easy to follow your ideas; however, some run-on sentences need to be fixed.
- Diagrams/Photographs: I know it might be challenging, but It would be great if you can provide photos taken by yourself.
Also, you mentioned the similarities/differences between luo and Kwanggari, so I recommend that you can put a photo of luo.
good job!