Course:EOSC311/2026/The Economic Impact of Geological Natural Disasters
Add Summary Here
Introduction
Overview
Geological natural disasters are one of the many things out of human control. These include events such as earthquakes, tsunamis, landslides, and volcanic eruptions. The result of these disasters leave devastating consequences for the surrounding area’s economy and communities, with some affecting generations to come. By looking at the geological processes behind them, specifically plate tectonics, fault movement, and volcanic activity, we can better understand these disasters. While we can’t control when and how it happens, we can learn to understand and predict them, to better prepare for when they do happen. In this Wiki page, we will analyze the geological causes of these disasters and how these events create financial and social challenges for those affected. We will be comparing three different earthquakes, the 2011 Japan earthquake, the 2010 Haiti earthquake, and the 2008 Sichuan earthquake.
Connection to Our Majors
Our majors are Math and Commerce (Accounting Specialization). We chose this topic as the economic impacts of natural disasters can be analyzed from a quantitative standpoint. With Math, we can use mathematical models to analyze earthquake frequencies as well as create risk assessments. While with Commerce, we can measure economic damage in the form of insurance claims, government spending, reconstruction budgets, and business recovery. By combining both our majors, we can analyze government funding and reconstruction strategies by creating mathematical models to help communities better understand the cost and exact condition of damage. This will allow people to better prepare for the disasters and reduce financial losses.
Why We Chose This Topic
We chose this topic, irrespective of our majors, as geological natural disasters affect everyone. The aftermath of these events not only have infrastructure effects on the area, but also economic and social effects on the population that reside there. The impact these disasters can have goes as far as life or death for people, making it a very important thing to try to understand. By analyzing past events through their causes and lasting effects, we can learn to better prepare in the future when they happen so that recovery can be smoother.
Claim
Mathematics and accounting can play a crucial role in understanding and quantifying the impacts of geological natural disasters.
Examples of Natural Disasters
2011 Tohoku Earthquake
The 2011 Tohoku earthquake occurred on March 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM local time. The earthquake struck off the northeastern coast of Honshu, Japan. The magnitude was recorded at 9.1, and it had a focal depth of 29 km, making it one of the strongest earthquakes ever recorded in Japan (Rafferty, 2026). The epicenter of the quake was located 130 km east of Sendai, in Miyagi Prefecture. The earthquake occurred along the Japan Trench, where the Pacific Plate subducts beneath the Eurasian Plate, as shown in Figure 1.
The rupture zone was around 300 km by 150 km, causing the ocean floor to shift approximately 50 m horizontally and 10 m vertically. The shifting of the ocean floor caused the displacement of a massive volume of water and triggered the tsunami that hit after the earthquake (Rafferty, 2026).
While the shaking caused significant damage on land, the tsunami was responsible for the majority of the destruction and deaths associated with the disaster. In some areas, the tsunami waves reached heights of over 30 m and travelled several kilometers inland, destroying coastal communities across northeastern Japan, including Sendai, Kamaishi, Ishinomaki, and Kesennuma (Rafferty, 2026). Approximately 18 500 people were killed or reported missing, with over 90% of the deaths caused by drowning (World Vision, n.d.). Japan’s early warning systems gave residents around 30 seconds of notice before the shaking reached them, which helped reduce the number of casualties. However, the tsunami struck around 30 minutes later and overwhelmed the coastal defences and evacuation zones (World Vision, n.d.).
Another disaster occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant after the earthquake and tsunami. The flooding from the tsunami disabled the backup generators needed to cool the nuclear reactors. This led to partial meltdowns, explosions, and radiation being released into the surrounding area (Rafferty, 2026). By April 2011, the nuclear disaster was rated Level 7 on the nuclear event scale alongside the 1986 Chernobyl disaster. Some areas have been deemed inhabitable for decades, and the reactors are not expected to be fully decommissioned for another 30 to 40 years (World Vision, n.d.).
The economic damage from the disaster was massive. Direct losses were estimated at $294 billion CAD, making the 2011 Tohoku earthquake the costliest disaster on record at that time (Kajitani et al., 2013). More than 119 000 buildings were destroyed and 685 00 were damaged. Major economic sectors such as manufacturing, fisheries, agriculture, and tourism were disrupted for many months (Kajitani et al., 2013). GDP declined in the first half of 2011, and 656 companies filed for bankruptcy in the first year after the disaster (Kajitani et al., 2013). Thankfully, Japan’s strong economy and infrastructure allowed for a relatively quick recovery. The Japanese government committed around $217 billion CAD for reconstruction and the Reconstruction Agency was established in 2012 to oversee a ten year long plan to rebuild and repair the damages (Rafferty, 2026).
2010 Haiti Earthquake
The Haiti earthquake took place on January 12, 2010 at 4:53 PM local time, around 25 km southwest of the capital Port-au-Prince. It had a magnitude of 7.0 and a depth of 13km. Since it was a relatively shallow earthquake, the shaking at the surface was much more intense than a deeper earthquake of the same magnitude (Pallardy, 2026). Geologists originally believed that the earthquake occurred along the Enriquillo-Plantain Garden fault system, which is the transform boundary between the Gonave microplate and the Caribbean Plate, as shown in Figure 2. However, they later determined that the rupture was most likely caused by the previously unknown Léogâne thrust fault (Pallardy, 2026). Aftershocks of magnitudes 5.9 and 5.5 struck hours after the initial shake, and other aftershocks continued to occur in the following days.
Even though the Haiti earthquake was much smaller in magnitude than the 2010 Tohoku earthquake, the death toll was far greater. Over 220 000 people were killed, 300 00 were injured, and more than 1.3 million were left homeless (Government of Haiti et al., 2010). The disaster affected almost 15% of Haiti’s population. The high number of casualties was mainly due to poor building construction, weak enforcement of building codes, and an overall lack of adequate earthquake resistant design standards (Pallardy, 2026). Many of the buildings in the affected areas completely collapsed from the shaking, trapping residents inside. Recovery efforts were also hindered by the failure of the power grid, collapsed communication networks, and roads blacked or damaged by debris. Many of the survivors had to wait hours or even days to receive medical assistance (Pallardy, 2026).
The economic impacts of the earthquake were severe. Haiti’s economy had already been weakened by previous storms and hurricanes, so they were ill-suited to face the earthquake. Total damages and losses were estimated at $10.9 billion CAD, which was equivalent to approximately 120% of Haiti’s entire GDP in 2009 (Government of Haiti et al., 2010). More than 105 000 homes were completely destroyed and another 208 000 were damaged. Hundreds of schools and hospitals became unusable. As for the long term impacts, the earthquake caused widespread job losses, increased migration, and a significant loss of human capital. It is estimated that per capita income in Haiti would have been around $570 CAD higher in 2020 if the earthquake had not occurred (Viganò & Eluère, 2022). The Haiti earthquake shows how a country’s level of economic development and infrastructure quality can affect how badly a disaster impacts the people and the economy.
2008 Sichuan Earthquake
The Sichuan earthquake struck the mountainous region of Sichuan Province, China on May 12, 2008 at 2:28 PM local time. The magnitude of the quake was 7.9 with a depth of 19 km. The epicenter was near the city of Dujiangyan, which is around 80 km from the provincial capital Chengdu (Pletcher, n.d.). The earthquake was triggered by the collision of the Indian-Australian Plate with the Eurasian Plate. The collision built up compressional stress along the Longmenshan Fault, and when the fault ruptured, the ground was thrust upwards up to 9 m (Pletcher, n.d.). Many smaller aftershocks occurred in the following days, including a 5.0 magnitude shake that struck Chengdu in May, 2010.
The destruction from the earthquake was widespread and severe. In the most heavily hit areas, entire towns and villages were completely destroyed (Pletcher, n.d.).
Approximately 90 000 people were killed or reported missing, and nearly 375 000 people were injured. One of the most devastating aspects of the disaster was that since the earthquake happened during school hours, the collapse of thousands of school buildings resulted in the deaths of over 5 300 children (Pletcher, n.d.). Secondary hazards also followed the initial shaking, as landslides blocked nearby rivers and created barrier lakes that threatened flooding until the drainage channels could be cleared.
Economic losses were estimated at approximately $172 billion CAD, and the damage spanned across six provinces (World Bank, 2018). Over 34 000 km of highways were destroyed, more than 1 200 reservoirs were damaged, and thousands of schools, hospitals and homes became unusable (World Bank, 2018). Sichuan and Gansu were the provinces most affected by the disaster, with their infrastructure, health, and education sectors suffering the most damage.
In terms of recovery, China focused not only on rebuilding damaged and destroyed infrastructure, but also on improving building structures to better withstand future earthquakes. Reconstruction efforts prioritized upgrading building codes and construction standards (World Bank, 2018). China’s recovery from the Sichuan earthquake is a good example of how post disaster reconstruction can be done effectively when there are enough resources available.
Geological Causes
Earthquakes are mainly caused by sudden stress release from faults, which can be explained by elastic rebound theory. “Rocks that are stressed beyond their ability to stretch can rupture, allowing the rest of the rock to snap back to its original shape”. This stress accumulation comes from the slow movement of the plate. Plates interact at convergent boundary, discrete boundary and transform boundary, resulting in different types of faults (Panchuk, 2019, p.4). Convergent boundary forms thrust fault, and transform boundary forms strike-slip fault.
The 2010 Haiti earthquake was triggered by a previously undiscovered blind thrust fault with a focal depth of about 13 km. The fault is "Léogâne fault", which inclines northward from Enriquillo-Plantain Garden fault zone, and the earthquake occurred on this fault plane. Because the source is shallow and close to Port‑au‑Prince, the ground vibration is amplified. In contrast, the earthquake in Japan in 2011 was a mega shock event on the convergence boundary, which occurred in Japan Trench where the Pacific plate dived below the North American plate. “The Japan Trench separates the Eurasian Plate from the subducting Pacific Plate” (Rafferty, 2026). Some subduction zones are 300 km long and 150 km wide, which suddenly move to the southeast by 50 m and uplift upward by about 10 m, thus causing a huge tsunami. The Sichuan earthquake in 2008 was the result of the collision between the Indian-Australian plate and the Eurasian plate. Stress accumulates along the Longmenshan Fault, which is a thrust fault, causing the ground to be locally lifted by 9 m(Pletcher, 2026, p.35).
Mathematical geology can help to analyze the distribution and frequency of these earthquakes. Vistelius(1976) defined mathematical geology as "a science that enables mathematical models of geological processes to be constructed and checked by direct geological observations". In principle, these models can be used to test the hypothesis about the recurrence interval of earthquakes. However, the Parkfield experiment shows that earthquake prediction is still very difficult even under intensive observation. Panchuk(2019) said, "There were no significant precursors to the 2004 Park Field Earthquake in any of the parameters measured". Therefore, geological genesis is more suitable to be understood in the form of probability, that is, the possibility of earthquake occurrence in a specific period is estimated by historical data.
Comparison of Events
Geological Comparison
All 3 of the earthquakes discussed in the Examples of Natural Disasters were caused by movement along tectonic plate boundaries. However, each earthquake had a different fault type and geological setting. Table 1 summarizes the key geological characteristics of each event.
| 2011 Tohoku Earthquake | 2010 Haiti Earthquake | 2008 Sichuan Earthquake | |
| Magnitude (Mw) | 9.1 | 7.0 | 7.9 |
| Depth (km) | 29 | 13 | 19 |
| Fault Type | Convergent (subduction zone) | Thrust fault | Convergent (thrust fault) |
| Tectonic Setting | Pacific Plate subducting beneath Eurasian Plate | Gonave microplate/Caribbean Plate transform boundary | Indian-Australian Plate colliding with the Eurasian Plate |
| Secondary Hazards | Tsunami, nuclear disaster | Landslides | Landslides, barrier lakes |
The 2011 Tohoku earthquake in Japan had the greatest magnitude, and it was the only one to trigger a tsunami, which then caused the nuclear disaster. This is because the rupture occurred along an underwater subduction zone, where the sudden vertical movement of the ocean floor displaced a huge amount of water, which in turn caused the tsunami (Rafferty, 2026). In comparison, the Haiti earthquake was more of a horizontal movement, as it was a strike-slip fault, so the ocean floor was not displaced vertically, thus no tsunami occurred. In terms of the magnitude, the Haiti and Sichuan earthquakes were significantly smaller, but since both were much more shallow than the Tohoku earthquake, the shaking was much more intense at the surface. In Haiti’s case, the shallow depth of just 13 km was a major factor of why the 7.0 magnitude earthquake caused such catastrophic damage (Pallardy, 2026). All three events also produced secondary hazards, which only caused more destruction and complicated rescue and recovery efforts.
Economic Comparison
The economic impacts of the three earthquakes were very different, in terms of both total cost and how those costs compared to each country’s economy. The total economic losses and death tolls are summarized in Table 2.
| 2011 Tohoku Earthquake | 2010 Haiti Earthquake | 2008 Sichuan Earthquake | |
| Total Economic losses (CAD) | $294 billion | $10.9 billion | $172 billion |
| Loss as % GDP | 3.4% | 120% | 3.5% |
| Deaths/Missing | 18 500 | 220 000 | 90 000 |
In terms of the total economic loss amount, Japan lost the greatest at a staggering $294 billion CAD. However, when the losses are compared to the size of each country’s economy, Haiti’s situation was by far the most severe. Haiti lost the equivalent of 120% of its entire GDP from the earthquake alone (Government of Haiti et al., 2010). Haiti was already one of the most impoverished nations in the world prior to the earthquake, so the $10.9 billion CAD economic loss exceeded the value of everything the entire nation produced that year. This made independent recovery almost impossible without a large amount of international financial support. So even though Japan and China had much larger total economic losses, they had the economic capacity and institutional strength to be able to fund large reconstruction efforts and recover within a few years (Rafferty, 2026; World Bank, 2018). Meanwhile, to this day, Haiti has never fully recovered from the 2010 earthquake.
Mathematical Comparison
One of the major differences between the three earthquakes was the role that mathematical modelling and early warning systems played in reducing casualties. Table 3 summarizes the warning systems that were available in each country at the time of the event.
| 2011 Tohoku Earthquake | 2010 Haiti Earthquake | 2008 Sichuan Earthquake | |
| Early Warning Systems | Yes | No | No |
| Warning Time | 30 seconds | None | None |
| Seismic Monitoring | Extensive | Minimal | Moderate |
| Deaths/Missing | 18 500 | 220 000 | 90 000 |
Japan had the most advanced seismic monitoring and early warning systems out of the three. Its nationwide network of seismometers continuously recorded ground movements and fed the data into real time mathematical models, which allowed the systems to detect the earthquake and provide warning to the residents before the strongest shaking arrived (World Vision, n.d.). Even though 30 seconds doesn't seem like much, it was enough time for the automated systems to shut down the Shinkansen trains, industrial plants, and warn people to take cover. This is why even with the 9.1 magnitude earthquake, Japan’s number of casualties is significantly lower than that of the 2010 Haiti and 2008 Sichuan earthquakes. In comparison, Haiti had only one official seismic monitoring station for the entire country at the time of the 2010 earthquake. The residents had no advance warning before the shaking began (Pallardy, 2026). Meanwhile, China had some monitoring in place, though without a public warning system, the people had no time to react before the earthquake reached them. Also, since the Sichuan earthquake struck during school hours, thousands of students were inside the building when it collapsed, and with no warning, they were unable to take cover in time (Pletcher, n.d.).
Why Recovery Differed
The differences in how each country recovered depended on their economic development, infrastructure quality, government response, and access to financial resources.
Japan had the fastest and most efficient recovery. Since Japan experiences earthquakes fairly frequently, the previously established earthquake warning systems, established infrastructure and strong government institutions allowed the country to respond quickly and fund massive rebuilding efforts (Rafferty, 2026). While the Fukushima nuclear disaster created long term challenges, most of the physical and economic damage from the earthquake and tsunami were addressed within a few years.
China’s recovery from the Sichuan earthquake was also relatively quick. This was mainly due to the fact that the Chinese government was able to mobilize resources quickly and efficiently to commit to a large-scale rebuilding program. More importantly, China used the reconstruction process as an opportunity to upgrade building codes and improve infrastructure quality to reduce vulnerability to future earthquakes (World Bank, 2018).
On the other hand, Haiti’s recovery was much more difficult. As mentioned above, Haiti was already one of the poorest nations in the world prior to the earthquake. They had very limited financial resources, weak government institutions, and infrastructure that was already in poor condition before the earthquake struck. The destruction of government buildings, hospitals, and schools made organizing relief efforts extremely challenging from the start (Pallardy, 2026). Even years later, recovery was far from complete, and the long-term economic damage continued into the next decade (Viganò & Eluère, 2022; Fresnillo, 2020). Haiti is a clear example of how a country's pre-existing socioeconomic conditions can be just as important as the earthquake itself in determining how severe the impact is and how long
The Future Role of Mathematics and Commerce in Disaster Management
Disaster management increasingly relies on the combination of mathematical modeling and commercial financial tools. Mathematics provides a framework for probabilistic risk analysis. Vistelius(1976) emphasized the use of stochastic models in geology. In practice, these models are used to estimate earthquake probability. For example, Panchuk(2019) pointed out that the probability of an earthquake of magnitude 6.7 or above in the San Francisco Bay Area before 2043 is 72 %(p.27). However, these models can't provide accurate earthquake occurrence time, but only give long-term possibility.
Business and accounting play a key role through insurance, budgeting and post-disaster financial recovery. Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011 caused the real GDP to drop by 0.7% in the first quarter of 2011, and the insurance compensation was estimated to reach 3.5 trillion yen. Despite the huge losses, Japan's strong insurance system and government budget supported the recovery. On the contrary, in 2010, only a few losses were covered by insurance (Collins, n.d., p.4). Fresnillo(2020) pointed out that Haiti still faces the problem of debt and reconstruction funds shortage after ten years. This comparison shows that business resilience is the key variable affecting the speed of post-disaster recovery.
The combination of mathematics and business is also reflected in the risk-oriented resource allocation. Panchuk(2019) recorded that British Columbia used earthquake risk assessment to determine the priority of school reinforcement. This process combines probability estimation with cost-benefit analysis (p.27). Insurance companies also use catastrophe models based on geological data to set premiums. Japan's early warning system relies on mathematical algorithms and needs continuous public and private investment (Rafferty, 2026). Bolt(2026) discussed various methods to mitigate earthquake disasters, including improving building standards and carrying out earthquake zoning. However, the effectiveness of these tools depends on the institutional capacity, and they need to be promoted by mathematical modeling and government financial investment.
The limitations of mathematical models are also worthy of attention. Random field models in Geostatistics can be used to describe the spatial distribution of disasters, but these models need a lot of high-quality data (Davis, 1973). Ten years after the earthquake, Haiti still faces a shortage of debt and reconstruction funds (Fresnillo, 2020), which may indicate that even if there is a mathematical model, the lack of financial infrastructure will limit its application. In developing countries, the lack of data and the lack of financial infrastructure limit the practical application of the model. Future research should combine mathematical innovation with policies to strengthen economic resilience. Therefore, the combination of mathematics and business in the future should go beyond simple risk calculation, and it is necessary to establish a fund allocation mechanism that adapts to different economies.
Conclusion
The geological causes behind the natural disasters show that they did not happen overnight. In all three scenarios, the earthquakes were caused by built up stress in the tectonic plates over long periods of time, where they happened at boundary zones. By regularly monitoring these zones, communities would be able to better predict when and where the earthquakes would happen. Using mathematical geology to determine the intervals of earthquakes, while still very difficult, can help regions have more information regarding potential future disasters.
Within the three earthquakes analyzed in this page, it was shown that places that were the least affected had proper warning systems in place and had strong financial systems. This was most notable with Japan, where they had a 30 second warning system to shut down trains and give people time to take cover. Whereas Haiti and China had no warning system in place, leading to much greater casualties of 220,000 and 90,000 respectively. Based on this, it is clear that having a warning system in place and consistent monitoring of the plates will lead to lower deaths and injuries. In terms of financial effects, Japan and China lost the most amount of money in the hundreds of billions. However, relative to their total GDP they were less affected with only a 3.4%-3.5% loss. Meanwhile Haiti who lost the least with $10.9 billion, suffered the most as relative to their GDP, they lost 120%. For larger countries, having more financial resources allowed them to recover quicker compared to Haiti who is still suffering financially to this day.
In summary, mathematics and accounting can play a crucial role in understanding and quantifying the impacts of geological natural disasters. By using mathematical models, communities are able to perform risk assessments to properly budget financial reserves and infrastructure reinforcement. These three disasters showed that from an accounting and business standpoint, having a strong insurance system and a large government financial reserve will aid in recovery efforts as well as avoid long term debt issues. Therefore, by having consistent monitoring of plate boundaries and strong financial institutions, communities can better prepare for natural disasters to minimize their effects.
References
Fresnillo, I. (2020, January 10). Haiti 10 years after the earthquake: The fight for social and economic justice continues. Eurodad. https://www.eurodad.org/10_years_haiti
Government of Haiti, Inter-American Development Bank, United Nations, World Bank, & European Commission. (2010). Haiti PDNA: Estimated earthquake impacts equivalent to 120% GDP. Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery. https://www.gfdrr.org/en/haiti-2010-pdna-estimated-earthquake-impacts-equivalent-120-gdp
Kajitani, Y., Chang, S. E., & Tatano, H. (2013). Economic impacts of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake and tsunami. Earthquake Spectra, 29(S1), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000108
Pallardy, R. (2026, February 14). 2010 Haiti earthquake. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/2010-Haiti-earthquake
Pletcher, K. (n.d.). Sichuan earthquake of 2008. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Sichuan-earthquake-of-2008
Rafferty, J. P. (2026, March 4). Japan earthquake and tsunami of 2011. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Japan-earthquake-and-tsunami-of-2011
Viganò, E., & Eluère, M. (2022). Long-term economic consequences of the 2010 Haiti earthquake. World Development, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106053
World Bank. (2018, May 11). Building back better plus. https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2018/05/11/building-back-better-plus
World Vision. (n.d.). 2011 Japan earthquake and tsunami: Facts, FAQs, and how to help. https://www.worldvision.org/disaster-relief-news-stories/2011-japan-earthquake-and-tsunami-facts
Grossi, P. (n.d.). The M9.0 Tohoku earthquake rupture zone illustrated along the Japan Trench subduction zone [Map]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Patricia-Grossi/publication/309173507_The_M90_Tohoku_Earthquake_Short-Term_Changes_in_Seismic_Risk
Pallardy, R. (2026, February 14). 2010 Haiti earthquake [Photograph]. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/2010-Haiti-earthquake
Daniell, J. E. (n.d.). A picture of severe damage due to the 12 May 2008 Sichuan earthquake of M7.9 [Photograph]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/A-picture-of-severe-damage-due-to-the-12-May-2008-Sichuan-earthquake-of-M79_fig2_216562832
Collins, T. (n.d.). Great East Japan earthquake: Economic and trade impact. Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/great-east-japan-earthquake-economic-and-trade-impact.pdf
Pallardy, R. (2026, February 14). 2010 Haiti earthquake. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/2010-Haiti-earthquake
Panchuk, K. (2019). Physical geology (1st University of Saskatchewan ed.). University of Saskatchewan.
https://www.saskoer.ca/physicalgeology/front-matter/physical-geology/
Pletcher, K. (n.d.). Sichuan earthquake of 2008. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Sichuan-earthquake-of-2008
Rafferty, J. P. (2026). Japan earthquake and tsunami of 2011. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Japan-earthquake-and-tsunami-of-2011
Vistelius, A. B. (1976). Mathematical geology and its approaches. Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, 8(6), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/628246
Fresnillo, I. (2020, January 10). Haiti 10 years after the earthquake: the fight for social and economic justice continues. Eurodad. https://www.eurodad.org/10_years_haiti
Bolt, B. A. (2026, March 11). Methods of reducing earthquake hazards. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/earthquake-geology/Methods-of-reducing-earthquake-hazards
Davis, J. C. (1973). Mathematical models in geology. In Geostatistics and Geomathematics. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/chapter/bookseries/abs/pii/B9780444410917500069
 |
This Earth Science resource was created by Course:EOSC311. |