Course:EOSC311/2025/Chemical Control and Management of Acid Mine Drainage

Summary

Acid mine drainage is a significant environmental issue that arises from the chemical reactions between sulfide minerals and water and/or air, often intensified by mining activities. This issue illustrates the connection between chemistry and geology, as it involves both the geological formation of sulfide mineral deposits and the chemical processes that occur when these minerals are exposed to air and water. Understanding acid mine drainage requires knowledge of mineral formation, redox chemistry, acid-base reactions, and metal solubility - all fundamental concepts in chemistry. This article explores the nature and origin of sulfide minerals, how they are mined and processed, the environmental impacts of acid mine drainage, and the chemical methods used to mitigate it. By examining acid mine drainage through both geological and chemical perspectives, we can better understand the challenges it presents and the strategies needed to address them.

Statement of Connection

Chemistry and geology are two branches of science that are closely linked. As a student of chemistry, I have a deep understanding about matter, its properties, and how it can change on a molecular scale. Throughout this course, I have thoroughly learned about Earth's minerals, how they form, and the geological processes and conditions required for their formation. Much of these facets of mineral formation can be described using chemical processes as well, only differing by the scale at which we observe them at. I believe that a strong foundation in chemical principles on a molecular level is important to deepen our understanding of geological systems and processes on scales that involve the entire planet.

This connection is especially evident in the study of acid mine drainage, a process where rocks containing sulfide minerals react with water and oxygen to produce acidic solutions. These reactions are governed by fundamental chemical principles, such as redox chemistry, acid-base equilibria, and solubility. Understanding the molecular-level transformations of iron, sulfur, and other elements is essential not only for predicting the formation and severity of acid mine drainage, but also for developing effective mitigation strategies. In this way, chemistry provides powerful tools for interpreting and managing geological phenomena with significant real-world implications.

Sulfide Minerals

Overview

Figure 1. Pyrite, one of the most common sulfide minerals. It has the chemical formula FeS₂.

Sulfide minerals are a class of minerals containing compounds consisting of one or more metals and sulfur. They are most commonly found as metal ores, and retain many of the properties of metals such as lustre. Many of the metals heavily used by society are originally come from sulfide minerals, including copper, iron, lead, zinc, cobalt, nickel, etc. Some precious metals like platinum, silver, and gold are also found as these sulfide metal ores.

While sulfide minerals are usually only mined and refined for their elemental metals, some also have specific uses in their mineral form. Pyrite for example, one of the most abundant sulfide minerals on Earth, is most commonly used to make sulfur dioxide - a chemical which is heavily used in the pulp and paper industry. Pyrite is also used to make sulfuric acid, one of the most commonly used chemicals worldwide.

Formation of Sulfide Minerals

There are two main types of sulfide ore deposits, each describing their method of formation. Volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) ore deposits are formed through volcanic means, and sedimentary exhalative (SEDEX)/sediment-hosted massive sulfide deposits are formed through sedimentary means.

Volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits

Figure 2. A diagram showing the percolation of water into volcanic rock, leaching metals and sulfides. The water is heated and later ejected back into the cold ocean where minerals precipitate.

VMS deposits are formed in undersea volcanic environments, typically located at subduction zones. These deposits originate from hydrothermal systems driven by the heat of underlying magma bodies, which cause seawater to circulate through the oceanic crust. As the water percolates downward, it is heated and reacts with the surrounding volcanic rocks, leaching out metals such as copper, zinc, lead, and iron, as well as sulfur. The resulting hot, metal and sulfur rich water then rise back toward the seafloor, where they encounter colder seawater. This rapid change in temperature causes the metals and sulfur to quickly precipitate out of the water, cooling them suddenly and changing them chemically. The precipitated sulfide minerals then settle, forming large accumulations of minerals like pyrite, chalcopyrite (CuFeS₂), sphalerite (ZnS), and galena (PbS).

Sedimentary exhalative (SEDEX)/sediment-hosted massive sulfide deposits

Figure 3. A diagram showing the formation of a SEDEX deposit. The exhalative ore deposits its minerals on top of the seafloor, while the replacement ore has its minerals precipitated out in the porous rocks already present.

SEDEX sulfide deposits are formed in undersea sedimentary basins. These deposits also originate from hydrothermal systems, although the water to carry the dissolved minerals is not directly heated by magma - instead by simply being deep underground. This water migrates through cracks in the seafloor, and slowly arrives at the top where it meets cold seawater to precipitate out all of its minerals. The precipitate is deposited on the seafloor and forms flat layers, similar to banded iron formations. Many SEDEX deposits can also form by having the mineral-rich water precipitate solids in porous layers under the seafloor. SEDEX deposits make up some of the world's largest galena, sphalerite, and acanthite (Ag₂S) deposits.

Chemistry of Sulfide Minerals

The chemical formation of sulfide minerals involves reduction-oxidation chemistry - more specifically the reduction (i.e. gain of electrons) of a metal cation and the oxidation (i.e. loss of electrons) of a sulfur species. The general reaction formula goes as such:

${\ce {M_{(aq)}^2+ + S_{(aq)}^2- -> MS_{(s)}}}$

where M²⁺ is a divalent metal cation. Sulfur can react as a divalent anion or be present as hydrogen sulfide (H₂S), with hydrogen gas also being a product of reaction.

A type of bacteria called sulfate reducing prokaryotes (SRP) reduce sulfate ions (SO₄^2-) into sulfide species which can then react with many dissolved metals to produce highly insoluble metal sulfides.

Mining

Sulfide minerals are primarily mined in either open-pit mines when the deposits are near the surface, or in underground mines when the deposits are much deeper within the Earth. After the raw ore is extracted from the mines, the ore is then crushed to liberate the sulfide mineral from the host rock.

In order to further clean up and separate the sulfide minerals from other waste material, a method called froth flotation is used. This method takes advantage of the hydrophobic (water repelling) nature of the sulfide mineral molecules. Finely ground ore is added to water to form a slurry, and a collector chemical is added which targets and coats mineral particles to make them more hydrophobic. This chemical coating also allows the mineral to attach to air bubbles, allowing them to float to the surface of the water while leaving waste material to sink.

One of the largest underground sulfide mineral mines in Canada was the Sullivan Mine, located in southeastern British Columbia. Discovered in 1892 and brought into production in 1909, the Sullivan deposit became a world-renowned example of a SEDEX deposit. Its rich sulfide ore required extensive underground tunnelling, milling, and flotation infrastructure. The mine not only contributed significantly to the regional economy but also played a major role in the advancement of metallurgical processing, including early development of froth flotation techniques. Over its nearly 100-year operational lifespan, the mine produced approximately about 26 million tonnes of zinc, lead, and silver combined until its closure in 2001.

Another famous example of a large sulfide mineral deposit is the Mount Isa Mines in Queensland, Australia. This massive complex comprises the George Fisher and Lady Loretta underground mines and traces its origins back to 1923. Mount Isa is one of the world's top producers of zinc, lead, and silver—in 2019 alone, it produced around 326,000 tonnes of zinc, 158,000 tonnes of lead, and over 5.5 million ounces of silver from nearly 4.6 million tonnes of ore. These examples help to illustrate the vastness of sulfide mineral deposits around the world.

Acid Mine Drainage

Acid mine drainage (AMD) refers to the production of acidic water through the oxidation of sulfide minerals. This process occurs when sulfide minerals are exposed to oxygen or water, generating sulfuric acid. This acidic water is then able to easily leach toxic heavy metals from other surrounding rocks and lead them into important water supplies.

Figure 4. A river shown affected by acid mine drainage and after it has been treated.

Causes

While acid generation can occur naturally through long-term weathering of sulfide-bearing rocks, mining activities significantly accelerate the process. In particular, underground mining and open-pit excavation expose previously buried sulfide minerals to air and water. Once these minerals are uncovered, especially in waste rock piles or tailings, they begin to oxidize rapidly. The oxidation of pyrite, for example, follows this reaction to produce sulfuric acid:

${\ce {4FeS_{2(aq)}{+}15O2_{(g)}{+}14H2O_{(l)}-> 4Fe(OH)3_{(s)}{+}8H2SO4_{(aq)}}}$

This reaction produces sulfuric acid, which lowers the pH of nearby water, allows toxic metal ions such as lead to dissolve easily. These acidic waters can then leach into surrounding soils, groundwater, and surface water systems.

Impacts

The environmental impacts of acid mine drainage are widespread and long-lasting. One of the most serious consequences is the acidification of nearby streams, lakes, and groundwater. Aquatic life is particularly sensitive to changes in pH and metal concentrations. As a result, AMD can lead to immense damage of aquatic ecosystems, with fish, invertebrates, and plant life unable to survive in contaminated waters. Terrestrial ecosystems are also heavily affected by AMD, with land animals with aquatic prey losing a large portion of their sources of food.

Numerous mining sites across the world have experienced severe AMD problems. The Sullivan Mine in British Columbia, despite being one of the country’s most productive sulfide ore mines, became a key case study in AMD management and overall reclamation following its closure in 2001. The oxidation of leftover tailings and waste rock continues to produce acidic drainage, which is now controlled through active water treatment systems. In the United States, the Berkeley Pit in Montana is another infamous example - an open-pit copper mine filled with highly acidic water rich in heavy metals, posing ongoing risks to local wildlife and water systems.

These examples illustrate that acid mine drainage is not just a localized problem—it is a global environmental issue that links geological materials with chemical reactions and ecological consequences. Long-term monitoring, water treatment, and careful mine reclamation planning are essential to prevent and mitigate the damaging effects of AMD.

Remediation

There are many methods to remediate acid mine drainage, though this article will only cover two. All methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and are used depending on the situation.

Neutralization

One of the most common method to treat acidified water caused by AMD is to raise the pH of the water using a basic compound in order to precipitate out dissolved metal ions. Neutralizing the acid results in the dissolved metals becoming insoluble hydroxides which can later be removed from the water. Common neutralizing agents include quicklime (CaO) - which turns to lime (Ca(OH)₂) in contact with water, and limestone (CaCO₃). They are also the most frequently used due to their low cost and availability. Lime is first hydrated to form calcium hydroxide in this reaction:

${\ce {CaO + H2O -> Ca(OH)2}}$

Calcium hydroxide then dissociates into a calcium cation and 2 hydroxide anions.

${\ce {Ca(OH)2 -> Ca^2+ + 2OH-}}$

The pH increases as a result, and metal ions precipitate as their respective hydroxides. An example is given for iron:

${\ce {Fe^2+ + 2OH- -> Fe(OH)2_{(s)}}}$

Neutralization systems can be active or passive. Active systems involve continuous maintenance to keep the neutralization process going, while passive systems use natural forces like gravity to assist in adding chemicals - though they are less efficient compared to active systems.

A drawback of neutralization is that regardless of the system used, the system will become less efficient as time goes on. The sludge of metal hydroxides and unreacted base will accumulate and will ultimately need to be safely stored or disposed of. This issue has been a topic of interest for researchers, as they look for ways to recycle some of the compounds found in sludge.

Ion exchange

Another method in treating water affected by AMD is ion exchange. The idea is to exchange the unwanted and toxic dissolved ions in the water for safer ones by running the water through a material called ion exchange resin. There are two main types of resin: cation exchange resin which replace positively charged ions (e.g. metal cations), and anion exchange resin which replace negatively charged ones (e.g. sulfate).

In the context of AMD, the primary concern is removing toxic metal cations such as iron, zinc, copper, lead, cadmium, and nickel. A cation exchange resin is typically used. The resin initially contains harmless ions such as sodium (Na⁺) or hydrogen (H⁺). When the contaminated water passes through the resin, the metal ions in the water are attracted to and bind with the resin, displacing the harmless ions into the water. For example:

${\ce {2R-Na + Cu^2+ -> R2-Cu + 2Na+}}$

where R represents the resin. As a result, copper ions (Cu²⁺) are removed from the water and retained on the resin, while sodium ions (Na⁺) are released into the water in their place.

This method is advantageous as it has the ability to recover the metal ions removed from the water and purify them. Despite this, ion exchange is not widely used as it is quite an expensive treatment.

Conclusion

The issue of acid mine drainage offers a clear example of how chemistry and geology intersect to influence both natural systems and human activity. From the formation of sulfide minerals deep within the Earth to the chemical reactions that drive environmental degradation at the surface, a thorough understanding of molecular processes is essential. Chemistry not only explains how acid mine drainage occurs, but also provides the basis for designing effective remediation strategies, such as neutralization and ion exchange. These solutions depend on our ability to use pH, solubility, and ion behavior - some very important concepts in chemistry - to our advantage, with the goal of addressing a geologically driven environmental challenge. As society continues to rely on sulfide-based metal ores for infrastructure, energy, and technology, this interdisciplinary approach becomes increasingly vital. Combining both geological and chemical knowledge is key to managing the environmental consequences of mining and ensuring more sustainable use of Earth’s mineral resources.

References

This Earth Science resource was created by Course:EOSC311.