Sandbox:DavidKohler/Relativized Alon Conjecture/Regular tree completion
The regular tree completion of a given graph allows us to see important properties of the starting graph. In particular, it shows us that some subgraphs, that we call tangles, have a high second eigenvalue.
Definition
Let G be a finite connected graph with maximal degree less or equal to some integer d larger than 2. We define the d-regular tree completion of G to be the unique (up to isomorphism) infinite graph, Treed(G) which consists of attaching additional free edges to all vertices so that the graph obtained is d-regular. Equivalently, this is the universal covering of the starting graph.
Properties
Let ψ be a connected graph with maximal degree at most d > 2. Then we have
Where λ1(Treed(ψ)) is the spectral radius of that infinite graph and where λIrred(ψ) is the largest irreducible eigenvalue of the graph ψ.
| Proof | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Consider G, the VLG based on the graph ψ that realizes Treed(ψ). Then λ1(Treed(ψ)), the spectral radius of the d-regular tree completion of the the graph ψ, is the inverse of the infimum of all the positive roots, z, of the equation In other words, we have Where ZG(z) is the adjacency matrix of G. LemmaFor any connected graph ψ and the variable length graph G = Treed(ψ) we have where A = Aψ is the adjacency matrix of the graph ψ, D = Dψ is its degree matrix and
LemmaThe largest irreducible eigenvalue of the graph ψ, λIrred(ψ) is the inverse of the smallest root, y of the equation
Now consider the change of variables which is valid if Notice that this change of variable is increasing as long as it converges. Then we have which holds for We can now finish the proof. First, take the case where λ1(Treed(ψ)) > 2√d-1 then there is a z0 such that which is a root of the equation Let which is clearly a root of the equation and since we can conclude that Finally, for the case where λ1(Treed(ψ)) = 2√d-1 then this means that if z0 is a root of det[I-ZG(z)] = 0 then we have that Assume by contradiction that then there exists a y0 such that and that is a root of the equation But then, our correspondence of eigenvalues gives an associated eigenvalue z0 such that which contradicts our hypothesis. Hence we can claim that which concludes the proof of this property. |
| To do | |
|---|---|
| In the proof of the property, there is a lemma that is missing a proof. |