Course talk:PSYC305/2013ST2/ClassProject/6 References

Use American Psychological Association, 6th edition formatting.

Hey Everyone,

Just added some references and noticed a couple things. There were 2 citations for the 4th edition textbook, so I removed one of them and corrected some minor details within that reference. Curious if anyone cited the 5th edition textbook but didn't include that in the references. Also, I removed this random sentence "psychologists to measure. Why/why not?" which was between the "T" and "U" citations, and also removed "Some psychometric characteristics of gender diagnosticity measures: Reliability, validity, consistency across domains, and relationship to the Big Five." which seems like another random sentence right at the bottom of the page. Hope this wasn't intentionally put there by anyone for reasons that I am missing right now.

Hi, I have added the class handout as I thought it was relevant to our instructions and the creation of the questionnaire; anyone know a standardized way to cite/list this?

HI, I put this in alphabetical order because I am just that way...high C, high N...

:-)

Hi Kevin, this sort of thing is not something that you usually need to cite. Instead, just a description of what the handout said is enough.

Thanks Jaimie, I'll remove it. Cheers

As per APA style I've cited my direct quotes including author, date and page number (as per link below). Let's check we are all consistent on this before the pape is finished. cheers Kevin

http://www.ubc.ca/okanagan/library/citations/apa.html

Thanks for the link.

I believe this page might be what you are looking for for how to standardize the list. http://wiki.ubc.ca/Help:Footnotes_and_References

We don't need to add one more time if someone already put it in the reference list, right?

i believe so

Yes, we just need to have it in here once.