Critique
This is a really well done page, properly organized and straight to the point on an interesting topic. On the second paper I think a brief example of two target domains with shared second-order structure would be helpful for understanding.
On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:
- The topic is relevant for the course. 5
- The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
- The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5 it's complex but the background on MLNs is also on the wiki
- The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 4 some of the formalisms could use additional explanation, e.g. on homophily
- The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 4 maybe a little too concise!
- There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 3 I think there are spots examples would be useful here
- There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. NA
- It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
- It is correct. 5
- It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 5
- It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5 MLNs already separate
- It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5
- The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 5
- I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 5
- This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 5
If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 19
AlistairWick (talk)