Critique 1
Awesomely written! The balance between prose and point-form was great as was the
occasional use of mathematical notation as a quick vehicle for explanation.
Perhaps a quick conclusion outlining the future of the research may be helpful.
Some small grammatical mistakes:
"It compares the performance of several learning techniques on benchmark dataset for it." - I think this sentence should end with "datasets"?
There should be a period after "... stride" in "What is a CNN?"
On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:
- The topic is relevant for the course. 5
- The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
- The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5
- The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5
- The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 3
- There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 5
- There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 5
- It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
- It is correct. 5
- It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 5
- It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
- It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5
- The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 5
- I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 5
- This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 5
If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 19