Critique
On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:
- The topic is relevant for the course. 5
- The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
- The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5
- The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5
- The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5
- There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.5
- There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 5 - I don’t think adding pseudo code would be beneficial here
- It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
- It is correct. 5
- It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 5
- It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
- It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 4 - There aren’t any links to other pages in the wiki but I’m not sure there are any existing pages that would make a useful link
- The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 1 - I couldn’t find any references or links to external sources
- I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 5
- This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4
If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 18
The page is well written and the motivation is clear. Discussing the limitations is and the applications are good sections to have. The only big issue is there needs to be some citations or at least some referenced material in the bibliography. Other than that I only have a few suggestions
- There are some template sentences left over in the page which should be removed, and empty sections should also be removed.
- "Title" should probably be changed to "Higher Order Logic"